I don't know the circumstances why 61 children died it's on wikapedia no doubt where you got it from. So I did a bit of online research. They did indeed die in the line of fire hardly surprising when many of the gun battles were in streets. The IRA used civiians routinely as cover. What I did not realise was the IRA used child solidiers some as young as 12. So to claim the soldiers set out in the morning with the express intention of killing children is disgusting.
I gave you the clear option to condem the IRA that would have shut me up for good. And you couldn't do it could you. All on this forum now know without any question whatsoever we have an IRA Sympathiser in our midst.
I have condemned the IRA on here on several occasions. No problem whatsoever doing it again. There is absolutely no justification for violence on anyone's part including the IRA. [b][/b]
I condemned IRA violence and gave you the option to option to condemn the killing of 61 children in N . Ireland by the British Army and you
refused. Now I know you can read and I know you realise the stupidity of what you are saying. So trying to hide your embarrassment by making wild accusations about child soldiers and bringing up WW2 isn't fooling anyone.
You were asked a simple question.
Do you condemn the killing of 61 Irish children by the British Army in N. Ireland and you refused to condemn them. You have no shame and your anti Irish bile is thankfully largely confined to the past.