|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
FSG Have improved things but they are marginal at an era when big changes were needed. And increasing revenue is hardly an achievement with the TV money poring into the premiership all clubs revenue has soared If you call having a sustainable model is marginal, then you don't know what you are talking about. What exactly do you want? Who do you want as our owners? I would be surprised if you had an answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595 |
I like good financial management including good income generating activity, and that's something FSG do quite well. However profit seeking owners such as FSG come and go, and what's important is what they leave behind, as they exit and take their profits with them. My criteria for good ownership is what they've won and the quality of the infrastructure they leave behind! As it's unlikely they'll leave five or six hundred million Stg. in the locker room in lieu of the Stadium they should have built.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
I like good financial management including good income generating activity, and that's something FSG do quite well. However profit seeking owners such as FSG come and go, and what's important is what they leave behind, as they exit and take their profits with them. My criteria for good ownership is what they've won and the quality of the infrastructure they leave behind! As it's unlikely they'll leave five or six hundred million Stg. in the locker room in lieu of the Stadium they should have built. Yeah, would be great to have a brand new stadium while we are stuck mid table if not worse. Arsenal left Highbury as champions, how many times did they win it since them? Do you know how much the Spurs new stadium will go over budget with such a delay? How much have Spurs spent on players since they started their new shiny stadium?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Our stadium isn’t and won’t hold us back. We can extend further. The cost of a new stadium isn’t worth it and doesn’t make sense when you think how long it’s take to build and pay off.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564 |
I like good financial management including good income generating activity, and that's something FSG do quite well. However profit seeking owners such as FSG come and go, and what's important is what they leave behind, as they exit and take their profits with them. My criteria for good ownership is what they've won and the quality of the infrastructure they leave behind! As it's unlikely they'll leave five or six hundred million Stg. in the locker room in lieu of the Stadium they should have built. The Kirkby rebuild is the biggest infrastructural improvement we've had since Shanks arrived and built the boot room and re-did Mellwood. They have expanded Anfield. No credit for that?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595 |
I like good financial management including good income generating activity, and that's something FSG do quite well. However profit seeking owners such as FSG come and go, and what's important is what they leave behind, as they exit and take their profits with them. My criteria for good ownership is what they've won and the quality of the infrastructure they leave behind! As it's unlikely they'll leave five or six hundred million Stg. in the locker room in lieu of the Stadium they should have built. The Kirkby rebuild is the biggest infrastructural improvement we've had since Shanks arrived and built the boot room and re-did Mellwood. They have expanded Anfield. No credit for that? No red, I'm afraid there's no credit accruing to them for a missed opportunity, investment cowardice and a legacy of an outdated tart up stadium that fails to match the best of our competition. They bottled it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Moores who our red friend claimed had Liverpool fans dancing in the street when he left (I don't recall that) let's remember Moores built three stands yet he is a villain Henry the hero for building one
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
I like good financial management including good income generating activity, and that's something FSG do quite well. However profit seeking owners such as FSG come and go, and what's important is what they leave behind, as they exit and take their profits with them. My criteria for good ownership is what they've won and the quality of the infrastructure they leave behind! As it's unlikely they'll leave five or six hundred million Stg. in the locker room in lieu of the Stadium they should have built. The Kirkby rebuild is the biggest infrastructural improvement we've had since Shanks arrived and built the boot room and re-did Mellwood. They have expanded Anfield. No credit for that? No red, I'm afraid there's no credit accruing to them for a missed opportunity, investment cowardice and a legacy of an outdated tart up stadium that fails to match the best of our competition. They bottled it. The competition is on the field and probably seating capacity to increase revenues, competition is not on the design of the stadium or how shiny it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
I like good financial management including good income generating activity, and that's something FSG do quite well. However profit seeking owners such as FSG come and go, and what's important is what they leave behind, as they exit and take their profits with them. My criteria for good ownership is what they've won and the quality of the infrastructure they leave behind! As it's unlikely they'll leave five or six hundred million Stg. in the locker room in lieu of the Stadium they should have built. The Kirkby rebuild is the biggest infrastructural improvement we've had since Shanks arrived and built the boot room and re-did Mellwood. They have expanded Anfield. No credit for that? No red, I'm afraid there's no credit accruing to them for a missed opportunity, investment cowardice and a legacy of an outdated tart up stadium that fails to match the best of our competition. They bottled it. How would you feel if they’d ploughed all their and the clubs money into a new stadium and the we couldn’t afford the likes of Salah let alone VVD or Allison? You seem to forget, quite conveniently, that they’re not like City’s owners. They don’t have endless cash and had they done a new stadium we’d be in the same position as Spurs in not being able to invest in the squad and hence not be so competitive.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
I think my position is we needed owners with the resources once Moores left. Instread we are having to juggle on field vs the long term future of the club
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
