KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 17 18
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
Originally Posted By Markhutch1
The reality is they are appearing in the States and here in Liverpool in ever increasing numbers,contrary to what the politicians say.

The BBC is a mouthpiece for the politicians.

Remember how Suarez got banned, and the BBC amongst others,hyped up
the incident.However, John Terry escaped any reprimand.



I have no idea what your point is.

Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
M
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
M
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
The BBC is filled with cultural marxists.

Nearly as bad as the Liverpool Echo.

And

If Suarez played for Chelsea, he might not have been banned.

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
Originally Posted By Markhutch1
The BBC is filled with cultural marxists.

Nearly as bad as the Liverpool Echo.

And

If Suarez played for Chelsea, he might not have been banned.


The BBC is filled with cultural Marxists, and that's why they support a rich London Club's white English player instead of an industrial Northern club's immigrant player? Sure, yeah. That makes total sense. crazy

Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
M
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
M
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
Mauritius is owned by the Crown.

Just because there are palm trees and sunshine in winter dosent change much.

So is South Africa.Living there for years made it obvious.

Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
M
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
M
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
Difference is the FA played the card with Suarez whilst Terry just got a telling off.

The media jumped on the bandwagon about racism in football and of course the Liverpool player got the flak.

We were in England when this happened - so experienced the injustice first hand.

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
Originally Posted By Markhutch1
Difference is the FA played the card with Suarez whilst Terry just got a telling off.

The media jumped on the bandwagon about racism in football and of course the Liverpool player got the flak.

We were in England when this happened - so experienced the injustice first hand.


So a South American player from Liverpool was treated less favorably than a white English player from Chelsea, and from that you conclude that the BBC is Marxist? I'm sorry that makes no sense. I'm not bearing in on that issue. The way we made t-shirts for Suarez was embarrassing. But even if we assume that it's true Terry was treated better because he's English and white, that reflects conservatism and a white racist establishment, not Marxism. Those ideas are on opposite wings of the political spectrum.

I was in England at the time too. What injustice did you experience? Were you contacted by the FA for racially abusing someone?

Last edited by redordead13; 14/08/18 06:09 PM.
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
M
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
M
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343

The FA labelled the Suarez situation racist ie they played the card.

The media jumped on this.

The media cant be culturally marxist against our working class heroes like John Terry in case they incur our wrath.

Only against the man in the street.

So Luis became the poster boy.

Yes,it is two faced.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By Markhutch1
Mauritius is owned by the Crown.

Just because there are palm trees and sunshine in winter dosent change much.

So is South Africa.Living there for years made it obvious.


You are mad.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
T
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
T
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
I hear the club referred the matter to the police... A bit OTT that. Someone trying to be too clever perhaps? Too PC?

I think the Police would have thought twice about wasting time getting involved... at worst they may have contacted the player to give him a warning perhaps. Now that someone has referred the matter to them they may have to be seen to be doing something.


'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly

'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By Markhutch1
The BBC is filled with cultural marxists.

Nearly as bad as the Liverpool Echo.

And

If Suarez played for Chelsea, he might not have been banned.


What about when Suarez bit other players, 3 times was it?

As for Salah, it's driving without due care and attention, there has been a big push on this in the last year, immediate 6 points it should be and a heavy fine, so he's stupid to do it, they all have hands free/bluetooth in their cars!

Page 4 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 17 18

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion