KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
If this is the worst World Cup ever I can't imagine how exciting the best one must have been. Sales of tranquillisers must have gone through the roof


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By SSO
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
There are no bad sides in the quarter final of a World Cup


Possibly but I think this is the worst World Cup ever played in Europe. The last one in Brazil was awful after the group stage with the exception of Germany hammering Brazil to give everyone a laugh. The ones in South Africa and Japan/Sth Korea were dreadful.

The African nations have all failed to reach the last 16. Germany have been absolute dog$hit and a poor French team at last woke up and beat Argentina who had the worst defence they have ever had at a world cup. In that game every attempt on target went in until the 80th minute when Messi hit a backpass to Lloris.

England get to the last 8 and that will be seen as success at a time when everyone else has been so bad themselves.

A few good goals but this is not the highest level of football. That is still the CL by a country mile.

There were 3 sides who got through without dropping a point Croatia and Uruguay are not the most entertaining but they could yet take down one of the big boys given the chance. Belgium played the same weak opposition as ourselves. There are no standout teams which makes it interesting but not necessarily good. Its OK for the neutral fan who maybe wants to see a different team win it but there have been few classic matches and VAR is killing the atmosphere of goal celebrations and there have been few players who have put their mark on the tournament.

The next one in Qatar could kill International football before the Mexicans get to host it for the THIRD TIME in 40 years.


So what's a good world cup for you?

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
South Africa the worst one for me blowing them stupid trumpet things


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
South Africa the worst one for me blowing them stupid trumpet things


So your criteria on a football competition is how fans are supporting their teams, that's stupid IMO, I rather think it should be based on the quality on the pitch.

Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
M
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
M Offline
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
I cant speak for the black fans ,but the white fans in SA hate it too.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
I have enjoyed the World Cup so far, the 2 games yesterday were excellent.

The problem for me is that I am used to World Cup's being dominated by the best players in the world of their era, they put there name on it and produce outstanding performances.

Players like Maradonna/Gascoigne/Mattaaus/Gullit/Ronaldo (Brazil)/Zidanne/Baggio etc. International football now is dominated by team play, so it is more difficult for the individual to stand out, tactics have changed.

So far, I cannot think of an outstanding player who has put his mark on this world cup? same for the last few World Cups.



Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
South Africa the worst one for me blowing them stupid trumpet things


So your criteria on a football competition is how fans are supporting their teams, that's stupid IMO, I rather think it should be based on the quality on the pitch.


Yes that's my criteria the football played is irrelevant to me I don't even notice the score I just watch the crowd. Am I doing it wrong then ?


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
A
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By SSO
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
There are no bad sides in the quarter final of a World Cup


Possibly but I think this is the worst World Cup ever played in Europe. The last one in Brazil was awful after the group stage with the exception of Germany hammering Brazil to give everyone a laugh. The ones in South Africa and Japan/Sth Korea were dreadful.

The African nations have all failed to reach the last 16. Germany have been absolute dog$hit and a poor French team at last woke up and beat Argentina who had the worst defence they have ever had at a world cup. In that game every attempt on target went in until the 80th minute when Messi hit a backpass to Lloris.

England get to the last 8 and that will be seen as success at a time when everyone else has been so bad themselves.

A few good goals but this is not the highest level of football. That is still the CL by a country mile.

There were 3 sides who got through without dropping a point Croatia and Uruguay are not the most entertaining but they could yet take down one of the big boys given the chance. Belgium played the same weak opposition as ourselves. There are no standout teams which makes it interesting but not necessarily good. Its OK for the neutral fan who maybe wants to see a different team win it but there have been few classic matches and VAR is killing the atmosphere of goal celebrations and there have been few players who have put their mark on the tournament.

The next one in Qatar could kill International football before the Mexicans get to host it for the THIRD TIME in 40 years.


So what's a good world cup for you?


Good question. For me it was Italia '90. I agree with what ecnirp 98 says about it being more about tactics now and for me at least the knockout stages in recent tournaments have been very poor.
Perhaps my view on it is similar to his only back then there were nowhere near the number of foreign players in the English game so it was a great chance to see what everyone else was all about. Now expectations are higher and star players do not perform as well in teams that generally play 6 or 7 times a year.

I was in my mid 20's for what was my favourite World Cup. I wonder if my view is due to that? Back then Cameroon were the first African nation to arrive at world level and Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia had not been broken up.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Italia 90 was one of the greatest football experiences ever and we were so unlucky against Germany had we won it would have been Argentina in the final and I think we would have beat them


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By SSO
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By SSO
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
There are no bad sides in the quarter final of a World Cup


Possibly but I think this is the worst World Cup ever played in Europe. The last one in Brazil was awful after the group stage with the exception of Germany hammering Brazil to give everyone a laugh. The ones in South Africa and Japan/Sth Korea were dreadful.

The African nations have all failed to reach the last 16. Germany have been absolute dog$hit and a poor French team at last woke up and beat Argentina who had the worst defence they have ever had at a world cup. In that game every attempt on target went in until the 80th minute when Messi hit a backpass to Lloris.

England get to the last 8 and that will be seen as success at a time when everyone else has been so bad themselves.

A few good goals but this is not the highest level of football. That is still the CL by a country mile.

There were 3 sides who got through without dropping a point Croatia and Uruguay are not the most entertaining but they could yet take down one of the big boys given the chance. Belgium played the same weak opposition as ourselves. There are no standout teams which makes it interesting but not necessarily good. Its OK for the neutral fan who maybe wants to see a different team win it but there have been few classic matches and VAR is killing the atmosphere of goal celebrations and there have been few players who have put their mark on the tournament.

The next one in Qatar could kill International football before the Mexicans get to host it for the THIRD TIME in 40 years.


So what's a good world cup for you?


Good question. For me it was Italia '90. I agree with what ecnirp 98 says about it being more about tactics now and for me at least the knockout stages in recent tournaments have been very poor.
Perhaps my view on it is similar to his only back then there were nowhere near the number of foreign players in the English game so it was a great chance to see what everyone else was all about. Now expectations are higher and star players do not perform as well in teams that generally play 6 or 7 times a year.

I was in my mid 20's for what was my favourite World Cup. I wonder if my view is due to that? Back then Cameroon were the first African nation to arrive at world level and Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia had not been broken up.


Don't know what you're talking about except maybe you don't like tactics. Anyway i am enjoying the world cup, just too bad for you.

Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion