|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
The manager has targets that FSG fail to deliver and its the bloody tea ladies fault for not having second rate back up options. Back up's don't have to be second rate and you know it. There is plenty of quality out there and if there is no back up and we don't get VvD, Klopp is to blame for us not having a proper CB. We also don't know who cocked this one up early in the window. From what I read recently it was the press leek but as we don't know who, if anyone, sanctioned that then who do we blame? Klopp also met the player without permission (as did City and Chelsea apparently) so that added to Southampton's ammunition against us. But I still think this will go through. It'll get close to the close of the window and they'll shitte themselves and take the money.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
So if you're confident well get him why are you having a go at Klopp for not moving on?
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946 |
Has he been told these deals are completely dead and to move on by the powers tbat be ? I must have missed that snippet of info if that's the case. How am I supposed to know that? What you are missing is that the likes of Southampton and RB Leipzig have no need to sell their star players, the money in the Premiership is beyond obscene now meaning mid-table clubs can now sign £30million players and no longer need to sell to balance the books. As for Leipzig they are just minted so again, no need to sell. We've already moved on from Keita from what I can tell, and it makes sense especially with a release clause coming into effect next Summer. As for Van Dijk, the club royally screwed up earlier in the window, hence the apology, if he ends up going elsewhere then we definitely have cause to moan. However if Southampton flatly refuse to sell to anyone, despite the player wanting to leave, what exactly are we supposed to do? VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next. So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Last edited by paul66; 06/08/17 01:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404 |
@wilkij stop saying we'll sign Virgil !!! my expectations and hope are increasing.
It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
So if you're confident well get him why are you having a go at Klopp for not moving on? Good point, well made 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279 |
The manager has targets that FSG fail to deliver and its the bloody tea ladies fault for not having second rate back up options. Back up's don't have to be second rate and you know it. There is plenty of quality out there and if there is no back up and we don't get VvD, Klopp is to blame for us not having a proper CB. We also don't know who cocked this one up early in the window. From what I read recently it was the press leek but as we don't know who, if anyone, sanctioned that then who do we blame? Klopp also met the player without permission (as did City and Chelsea apparently) so that added to Southampton's ammunition against us. But I still think this will go through. It'll get close to the close of the window and they'll shitte themselves and take the money. I thought the press usually prefer turnips
'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly
'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Has he been told these deals are completely dead and to move on by the powers tbat be ? I must have missed that snippet of info if that's the case. How am I supposed to know that? What you are missing is that the likes of Southampton and RB Leipzig have no need to sell their star players, the money in the Premiership is beyond obscene now meaning mid-table clubs can now sign £30million players and no longer need to sell to balance the books. As for Leipzig they are just minted so again, no need to sell. We've already moved on from Keita from what I can tell, and it makes sense especially with a release clause coming into effect next Summer. As for Van Dijk, the club royally screwed up earlier in the window, hence the apology, if he ends up going elsewhere then we definitely have cause to moan. However if Southampton flatly refuse to sell to anyone, despite the player wanting to leave, what exactly are we supposed to do? VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next. So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold I read the other day that it wasn't us talking to him that p!ssed them off as Chelsea and City also did but the story in the press.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404 |
@wilkij my bad I mis read your comment If we miss out on VvD I just hope it's a f**kn InSaNE bid, let's really test them!!! As long as we don't go bankrupt offer £160m + £30m add-ons, Or pay Newcastle to bid £70million then give the Ojo for free as a thank you , C'mon LFC better get creative !!!!!! If we are so f***kn keen on Virgil than we should try every trick in the book!!!!!!
It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404 |
Has he been told these deals are completely dead and to move on by the powers tbat be ? I must have missed that snippet of info if that's the case. How am I supposed to know that? What you are missing is that the likes of Southampton and RB Leipzig have no need to sell their star players, the money in the Premiership is beyond obscene now meaning mid-table clubs can now sign £30million players and no longer need to sell to balance the books. As for Leipzig they are just minted so again, no need to sell. We've already moved on from Keita from what I can tell, and it makes sense especially with a release clause coming into effect next Summer. As for Van Dijk, the club royally screwed up earlier in the window, hence the apology, if he ends up going elsewhere then we definitely have cause to moan. However if Southampton flatly refuse to sell to anyone, despite the player wanting to leave, what exactly are we supposed to do? VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next. So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold I read the other day that it wasn't us talking to him that p!ssed them off as Chelsea and City also did but the story in the press. Hey Wilkij remember I was saying it was never the tapping up that [oops] them off, I said this even before FSGpools' statement , the press leak put off the bidding war which upset so'ton , We used our media as a tactic to bully so'ton to lower asking price , so'ton anger was bound to happen and why so many FSGout are frustrated with how we do business , we are seeing the negative affect of our transfer strategy. No ITK here, just amatuer FSGpool, easy to interpret the clowns
It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946 |
Has he been told these deals are completely dead and to move on by the powers tbat be ? I must have missed that snippet of info if that's the case. How am I supposed to know that? What you are missing is that the likes of Southampton and RB Leipzig have no need to sell their star players, the money in the Premiership is beyond obscene now meaning mid-table clubs can now sign £30million players and no longer need to sell to balance the books. As for Leipzig they are just minted so again, no need to sell. We've already moved on from Keita from what I can tell, and it makes sense especially with a release clause coming into effect next Summer. As for Van Dijk, the club royally screwed up earlier in the window, hence the apology, if he ends up going elsewhere then we definitely have cause to moan. However if Southampton flatly refuse to sell to anyone, despite the player wanting to leave, what exactly are we supposed to do? VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next. So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold I read the other day that it wasn't us talking to him that p!ssed them off as Chelsea and City also did but the story in the press. yes you are right. They knew we were talking to him and chelsea,city. But the story [oops] them off so they used the blackpool talks to make us apologise. The Liverpool PR team have a lot to answer for not only that but all the stories about Klopp spending 200m and then he is talking about moreno and milner like new signings. The lot of them should just stfu
|
|
|
|
|
