Many fans are divided based on the lack of transfer activity, some beleive we could've maintained a title push had we have invested in the squad , I'm one of those rare people who was fully understanding when Klopp kept the purse tightly shut .
It's a simple stance, no point buying players for the short term.
had we have bought the quality in salah if we had spent on a second rate winger?
I think a perfect solution in this time was more the loan market, we had markovic we could have had back from loan. We could have loaned a player in the time and not risk improper investment in a quick fix.
But ultimately even though FSG fail to flatter atleast we can se that the first and final word is "TRULY" klopp's which is why their are no "panic targets" : meaning targets we are interested in only in the short term .i.e. Konoplyanka
So are people happy with Klopp's Quality or Nothing approach, changing the way we approach transfer market , do you think if Southampton and Leipzig hold firm , we should consider loaning players in to beef up the squad and save money to try again in January for top targets???
or settle and buy second-rate targets in this window and effectively end interest in our top targets ???
Again it's really early days and the club will keep trying the first choice before turning to the next. Should we do it quicker, I don't know, United wanted to sign Morata but signed Lukaku who I think is not better or even worse, but maybe Real was looking for too much money.
