KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 12 of 13 1 2 … 10 11 12 13
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By Ambitious1
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By Ambitious1
He is a noticeable step up on Mignolet. Not only is he a shot stopper but has aerial presence, both of which our current 2 GK's have little or none of. We are 10 points off chelsea and if you think they are gonna pi** away that with the quality of squad and team they have and actually believe we have the ability to catch them given our squad depth then thats insanity.


I never said we could catch Chelsea, you said we are no threat to them which is inaccurate.


How are we a threat to them? They have quality in depth, we dont. Ok so we might beat them at Anfield they will still pull away because of how good they have been.


We beat them at Stamford Bridge, they won't be looking forward to coming to Anfield believe me.

They have a decent squad but if you took out Cahill/Luiz, Hazard and Costa through injury, they'd struggle just like we have without key players.

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 691
A
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 691
They have Zouma coming back from injury, fabregas on the bench to replace hazard if he got injured and pedro has been scoring well and they have that kid Batshauyi. Thats a quality team. Our back up is klavan, Lucas then playing a midfielder as a forward. Thats the difference.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By Ambitious1
They have Zouma coming back from injury, fabregas on the bench to replace hazard if he got injured and pedro has been scoring well and they have that kid Batshauyi. Thats a quality team. Our back up is klavan, Lucas then playing a midfielder as a forward. Thats the difference.


Zouma has only played a few first team games and is a promising prospect, exactly the same as Gomez.

Fabregas cannot play left wing so could never be a replacement for Hazard.

Batshauyi was left out by Conte when Costa was unavailable so he's no different to Origi or Sturridge for ourselves. Also Conte played Pedro as a striker when Costa was out, so exactly the same as us.

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 691
A
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 691
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By Ambitious1
They have Zouma coming back from injury, fabregas on the bench to replace hazard if he got injured and pedro has been scoring well and they have that kid Batshauyi. Thats a quality team. Our back up is klavan, Lucas then playing a midfielder as a forward. Thats the difference.


Zouma has only played a few first team games and is a promising prospect, exactly the same as Gomez.

Fabregas cannot play left wing so could never be a replacement for Hazard.

Batshauyi was left out by Conte when Costa was unavailable so he's no different to Origi or Sturridge for ourselves. Also Conte played Pedro as a striker when Costa was out, so exactly the same as us.


Then by what your saying then, why are we 10 points behind them sitting in 4th? Surely if them players were that good we would be higher and less points off them if any. And Zouma played much more games for chelsea than Gomez did for us. He was playing out of his skin for them until he got that injury. Fabregas can play as a no10 like hazard.

It doesnt matter what i was, your gonna try justify your point about liverpool players been better than what they are. Origi and sturridge havent done it for us this season at all. Origi may be young so people will give him more time, but sturridge hasnt been consistently good for us since suarez left.

Chelsea are much better than us at the moment and i think its dangerous your whishful thinking that we could catch them.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By Ambitious1

Then by what your saying then, why are we 10 points behind them sitting in 4th? Surely if them players were that good we would be higher and less points off them if any. And Zouma played much more games for chelsea than Gomez did for us. He was playing out of his skin for them until he got that injury. Fabregas can play as a no10 like hazard.

It doesnt matter what i was, your gonna try justify your point about liverpool players been better than what they are. Origi and sturridge havent done it for us this season at all. Origi may be young so people will give him more time, but sturridge hasnt been consistently good for us since suarez left.

Chelsea are much better than us at the moment and i think its dangerous your whishful thinking that we could catch them.


When have I ever said we can catch Chelsea?

Hazard plays off the left wing, not as a number 10 so no Fabregas couldn't replace him.

Well your saying Batshauyi is an option for Chelsea, he's completely unproven in this league and has hardly played, so he can't be a better option than Origi or Sturridge. If Batshauyi played for us and Origi for Chelsea you'd be saying the same thing but the other way round. It's like the novelty of a player from another club excites, no matter how good he is.

I'm not making Liverpool out to be better than they are, I'm stating that we aren't as bad as you make out, there is a big difference!

We're a work in progress, Chelsea won the title in 14/15 with pretty much the same squad they have now, they just imploded for some reason last season. They also haven't suffered key injuries this season like we have. Also I haven't disagreed that they have a stronger squad, I'm merely relating our squad to your points. Unfortunately you only seem to be interested in slagging off LFC which is your right, but I look at positives as well as negatives.

Last edited by Chris2402; 24/01/17 10:19 PM.
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 691
A
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 691
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By Ambitious1

Then by what your saying then, why are we 10 points behind them sitting in 4th? Surely if them players were that good we would be higher and less points off them if any. And Zouma played much more games for chelsea than Gomez did for us. He was playing out of his skin for them until he got that injury. Fabregas can play as a no10 like hazard.

It doesnt matter what i was, your gonna try justify your point about liverpool players been better than what they are. Origi and sturridge havent done it for us this season at all. Origi may be young so people will give him more time, but sturridge hasnt been consistently good for us since suarez left.

Chelsea are much better than us at the moment and i think its dangerous your whishful thinking that we could catch them.


When have I ever said we can catch Chelsea?

Hazard plays off the left wing, not as a number 10 so no Fabregas couldn't replace him.

Well your saying Batshauyi is an option for Chelsea, he's completely unproven in this league and has hardly played, so he can't be a better option than Origi or Sturridge. If Batshauyi played for us and Origi for Chelsea you'd be saying the same thing but the other way round. It's like the novelty of a player from another club excites, no matter how good he is.

I'm not making Liverpool out to be better than they are, I'm stating that we aren't as bad as you make out, there is a big difference!

We're a work in progress, Chelsea won the title in 14/15 with pretty much the same squad they have now, they just imploded for some reason last season. They also haven't suffered key injuries this season like we have. Also I haven't disagreed that they have a stronger squad, I'm merely relating our squad to your points. Unfortunately you only seem to be interested in slagging off LFC which is your right, but I look at positives as well as negatives.


Well the negatives overweigh the positives which is why most in here are starting to turn from how the previously felt about the whole team currently. Im not trying to catch you out chris because I fully understand with what your saying. Im just saying we cannot compete with chelsea until the establishment changes or the current ones change their ideas.

We could beat them at Anfield and make them lose 3 points but they will still win the league. Theres always a chance of them slumping but the odds on that are far greater than if they didnt. Im outlining that im pi**ed off because there was opportunities for us to go places and we wont because of how the clubs is run restricts us.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By Ambitious1
Well the negatives overweigh the positives which is why most in here are starting to turn from how the previously felt about the whole team currently. Im not trying to catch you out chris because I fully understand with what your saying. Im just saying we cannot compete with chelsea until the establishment changes or the current ones change their ideas.

We could beat them at Anfield and make them lose 3 points but they will still win the league. Theres always a chance of them slumping but the odds on that are far greater than if they didnt. Im outlining that im pi**ed off because there was opportunities for us to go places and we wont because of how the clubs is run restricts us.


Up until January the positives firmly outweighed the negatives but nobody was interested then. It's almost like people want us to struggle so they can moan and kick off, I just don't understand it at all.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By sixtiesred
No it's not we want the positives to continue we liked what we were seeing

And every time we look capable of a challenge we lose someone or more and the same things are said we not just buying for the sake of it ? No one wants that we want a fully stocked squad is that so bad to want ? Really ?


Agreed, I'm merely stating that up until this month we were looking extremely good. If we'd have hung on for victories against Sunderland and Man Utd and got the expected result against Swansea would there be this much negativity? I seriously doubt it!

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By sixtiesred
I dunno we have looked terrible very fustrating to see a good start get wasted again


A goal each from Sunderland and Man Utd in the last 5 minutes of games have cost us 4 points. It's not all negative.

I get the frustration and yes the squad needs strengthening, of course it does, but I don't believe its half as bad as people are making out.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By sixtiesred
I dunno we have looked terrible very fustrating to see a good start get wasted again


A goal each from Sunderland and Man Utd in the last 5 minutes of games have cost us 4 points. It's not all negative.

I get the frustration and yes the squad needs strengthening, of course it does, but I don't believe its half as bad as people are making out.


I think it all depends on expectations, the team is not bad for a 5-7th finish but not that good for a 4th finish and bad for winning the league

Page 12 of 13 1 2 … 10 11 12 13

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion