KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Sterlings talks transfer & Abuse

Tangles logic.

ofcorse as its the only one that matters to me...

Hardly. He got injured so hasn't played so how can that be the same logic?

the logic is applied if City don't qualify for the Champions League people will say Sterling hasn't contributed enough due to the none qualification so the same can be applied for De Bruyne as he came for a shed load of money and his contribution no matter how big or small wont of earned them qualification either, so just shows how twisted some peoples logic can be. I reckon you judge wether Sterling and De Bruyne have been a success in about 5 seasons time depending on what City win, deffo not after 8 months at a Club and certainly not a 20 years of age...

No the logic would say none of their 'stars' have performed not just Sterling.

What I will say though is that if Sterling is a £49m player, why is he not good enough to be able to lift the team to better things like that 'rotter' Suarez did for us?

And if we judge players in 5 years time why don't we apply that to managers, Klopp for example as you seem to have already made up your mind after 2/3 of a season if the other thread is anything to go by?

ok if Sterling as you say is that good he should lift City up to better things then that must apply to Gerrard not being good enough to win is the League, he is the main reason we lost with that slip, if he was good enough he wouldn't of fell over, thats rite isn't it. I have made my feelings about Kloppsy quite clear up to now I have been underwelmed, he will get three transfer windows and if he is not at the required level sack him and send him back to Germany, don't think that opinion is particularly wrong or not fair. The Sterling case is different because he is 6 years off his peak, Kloppsy is at the pinnacle time age and career wise...

Sterling has a lot of 'better' players around him and I'm not saying he can win them the league as no one player can do that. But he's not performing to a level that is expected of a £49m player regardless of his age. We'd all be mighty p!ssed off if we'd paid that for him and he was playing like he is, you included.

And Klopp will suffer the same fate as all managers if they don't perform. He's not a miracle worker and has done OK with the player left for him. There is no real 'pinnacle age' for a manager as it's a job where you should be learning all the time especially when you come to a new country, league, team etc.

OUR Luis came within a whisker of achieving that status!

If we'd won the PL in 2014, I would have stood on the top of the Liver Berd on that truly iconic magnificent building on the Pier 'Ed showing me arse to all and sundry, hollering that out loud!

yes but ifSterling wins the league or champions league with City and even if he's average the move to City for that amount will be justified. If for example Sterling wins a league or champions league for City and scored about 10 goals and has an OK season, that will be seen as a better return than Suarez scoring 40 goals and finishing second and winning nothing...