|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 133
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 133 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. Why can you not just let him go!? I was fine until someone this morning started a thread insinuating about Brendan again. It's not about Brendan. It is about fans making a mockery of someone who tried his best, had good intentions, and to be honest didn't do a too bad of a job. I find it disrespectful. You keep calling him Brendan and bringing him up at every opportunity...I am now convinced you're a female relative or lover or something. This is not normal...honestly!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. For your stats to be meaningful I hope you have taken them from this season only as we should compare with the same squad, have you?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595 |
Yes add me to that Donut, and Red, the constant bashing of one of our previous managers is quite disgraceful and is shameful. The funny thing is when you meet LFC fans elsewhere you don't get that stuff at all, so clearly fans in here are not better than that Red. They are disgraceful and shameful as you rightfully say. And they don't represent the generality of LFC fans. With respect, I disagree and also don't understand your perspective. Rodgers made a public statement. He made comments about the club in response to a question that was put to him and his comments were published. This is an LFC football forum. A place where we come together to debate all matters LFC. Are you saying that we should never discuss anything that Rodgers says? That we should simply accept everything he says all the time and not express an opinion? I'm saying that the repeated abuse and personalised insults being handed out to a former manager of LFC (in this case Rodgers) is a disgrace and is shameful. I'm also saying that it is not representative of other LFC fans I meet and discuss our clubs progress with
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. For your stats to be meaningful I hope you have taken them from this season only as we should compare with the same squad, have you? No I took it from all of Rodgers' games as Liverpool manager. If you took it from Rodgers' 8 games (Prem only) then Klopp has a better record at this point in time.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 48
Trialist
|
|
Trialist
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 48 |
If truth be told the only reason he'd here is because he blotted his copybook in his final season at Dortmund. He had the second best team on paper, yet they hovered above the relegation zone for much of the season, making a mini recovery to finish a distant seventh in the end. This meant that he was not the safe pair of hands that some thought he was and a few clubs cooled their interest in him. Arsenal had been rumored to be sizing him up as a successor to Wenger at one stage, then it all went quiet.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. For your stats to be meaningful I hope you have taken them from this season only as we should compare with the same squad, have you? No I took it from all of Rodgers' games as Liverpool manager. If you took it from Rodgers' 8 games (Prem only) then Klopp has a better record at this point in time. So how is your original stat in anyway fair?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. For your stats to be meaningful I hope you have taken them from this season only as we should compare with the same squad, have you? No I took it from all of Rodgers' games as Liverpool manager. If you took it from Rodgers' 8 games (Prem only) then Klopp has a better record at this point in time. Then your stats are are not meaningful and doesn't prove much. I am sure you understand why. If you don't understand just ask, I will explain.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. For your stats to be meaningful I hope you have taken them from this season only as we should compare with the same squad, have you? No I took it from all of Rodgers' games as Liverpool manager. If you took it from Rodgers' 8 games (Prem only) then Klopp has a better record at this point in time. Thanks for provinv your IQ level.
Back to Back World Champions baby!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069 |
Jurgen Klopp: 1.69 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Brendan Rodgers: 1.75 avg. points per game (all competitions)
Any improvements under Klopp must mostly be superficial or may be even a placebo effect.
A big summer ahead. For your stats to be meaningful I hope you have taken them from this season only as we should compare with the same squad, have you? No I took it from all of Rodgers' games as Liverpool manager. If you took it from Rodgers' 8 games (Prem only) then Klopp has a better record at this point in time. So how is your original stat in anyway fair? Everyone on here I would imagine is thinking Klopp is doing better than Rodgers. So to me it makes sense to use Rodgers' overall record as benchmark for Klopp. Rodgers didn't get sacked just because of those 8 games, so it doesn't make sense to compare just those ones. As for the fair test, it is never going to be perfectly fair because of injuries, different fixtures etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 844
Under 18 Player
|
|
Under 18 Player
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 844 |
Whatever you say.
So maybe we look at overall managerial career?
From wiki ;
Klopp - 623 matches, won 304, drew 158 and lost 161 = 1.72 thereabouts if 3pts for a win and 1 for a draw.
Rodgers - 317, 143, 81 & 93 = 1.61
Winning %? 48.8% vs 45.1%
Mean anything?
Hell no! Cos like you said, too many factors that skew such statistical comparisons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
