KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
S
Spangles
Unregistered
Spangles
Unregistered
S
Originally Posted By van Gogh
Almost all our signings have been cáck though - regardless of price.

Lallana, Lovren, Balotelli, Markovic and Benteke all for more than £ 25 M for example.

Doesn't get any better when our bargain bin signings also turn out cràp though.
although I know we wont win leagues anymore I honestly believe we can reach where we are spending moderate amounts of money instead of 20 and 25 million pound players on 100k a week, I would feel a lot happier and accept finishing top 6 and winning domestic cups a lot more if we did that...

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Yes that's correct.

But those stats don't take into consideration if you sign a free agent. In our case there has been quite a few over the last years.

Milner the latest addition.

What's the average signing fee for him and Benteke? (30 + 0) / 2 = 15. Just as an example. smile

P
Prophet
Unregistered
Prophet
Unregistered
P
Originally Posted By Spangles
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Net is entirely valid though, for everyone. All we've done lately and all we've spent has been down to selling high value players. Look at utd last season and their net spend was over £100m. It means they're spending on good players (debatable in their case) and keeping what they have. I thought you of all people would use this to bash FSG?
yes good points made there, for me that's the part i don't mind about FSG, they are keeping the Club ticking over. I don't want 20 or 25 million pound players coming in on 100k a week wages, I would rather have a good enough manager spending 10 - 15 million pound on players with top earners on about 60 grand. We can still be a top 6 Club and pick up cups along the way with that way of operating which is a lot better way than what we had in the past with 25 million pound players like Llalana, Henderson, Lovren and Benteke e.t.c and still finishing top 6 or so...


What the douche. Says net spend is for the accountants...doesn't want the club to spend big money/wages on players.

I don't think you're stupid, Spangles, you just have bad luck when thinking.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Net is entirely valid though, for everyone. All we've done lately and all we've spent has been down to selling high value players. Look at utd last season and their net spend was over £100m. It means they're spending on good players (debatable in their case) and keeping what they have. I thought you of all people would use this to bash FSG?


Exactly

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion