No that performance would have been met with criticism if it wasn't for the fact that our manager only had 3 days to work with the players.
Maybe the fact that half the regular starting XI was on the treatment table had something to do with the outcome too? Origi as the only striker available perhaps didn't mean a downgrade?
I don't even know how increased running stats can be seen as a positive. Klopp has a different style of play which involves more intense running, how does that make it better than a slow possession game where there is less running required if the result is exactly the same?
How do you know the result would have been the same under BRENDAN?
And maybe the fact that the players now seemed to actually give a f*ck don't mean anything at all to you?
...there is also an increased risk of injury as Klopp also found out in his last season at Dortmund.
Overall a positive and promising start. I'm not having a go at Klopp, I just don't want people to take stats out of context.
No he didn't find that out at all. You have just taken stats out of context there my friend! The kind of injuries his players picked up at Dortmund was knocks and bruices from rough tackles being made to them by the opponents. How can you avoid these injuries by running less?
By the way: Are you married to BRENDAN or summat? Have never seen an LFC supporter being so positively hung up on a manager before. Let it go!
