KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Originally Posted By: Darcus
Would people still want Klopp in Rodgers had us in the CL places by January?


Probably not. Everyone one went quiet when we had our unbeaten run don't forget.


Just as you went quiet when he turned us into a steaming bucket of sh1te.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Originally Posted By: Darcus
Would people still want Klopp in Rodgers had us in the CL places by January?


Probably not. Everyone one went quiet when we had our unbeaten run don't forget.


Just as you went quiet when he turned us into a steaming bucket of sh1te.


No I didn't. Have a look back and you'll see I comment win, lose or draw. Just because I'm not as reactionary as you or others, spitting my dummy when things aren't going how I want them to doesn't mean I went quiet.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
Not really Wilks were weren't playing well even in that run and it was posted too


There were comments on how we played good or bad but not the unrelenting 'Rodgers out' speak that started once we lost to the scum.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Originally Posted By: Darcus
Would people still want Klopp in Rodgers had us in the CL places by January?


Probably not. Everyone one went quiet when we had our unbeaten run don't forget.


Just as you went quiet when he turned us into a steaming bucket of sh1te.


No I didn't. Have a look back and you'll see I comment win, lose or draw. Just because I'm not as reactionary as you or others, spitting my dummy when things aren't going how I want them to doesn't mean I went quiet.




Those of us who saw through him earlier than you were hardly spitting our dummies out.
I think that description would suit you perfectly as you quickly went from a Rodgers loyalist to not bothered if he goes.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Wrong again sponge boy. I've never been a 'Rodgers loyalist' as you put it. He's always been a bit meh for me and I wanted Martinez over him. Do I care if he goes? No. Do I care if he stays? A little as with Klopp available I think it's a missed opportunity. Is that Rodgers fault and does he deserve the abuse he gets? No.

What I do take exception to is people not giving credit where it's due and just bashing him. There are lots on here who were very quiet through the times we've won and then one loss or draw and they're all over Rodgers like a rash. Flames has been the worst for this but to be fair to him he's been very consistent throughout unlike a lot on here.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Wrong again sponge boy. I've never been a 'Rodgers loyalist' as you put it. He's always been a bit meh for me and I wanted Martinez over him. Do I care if he goes? No. Do I care if he stays? A little as with Klopp available I think it's a missed opportunity. Is that Rodgers fault and does he deserve the abuse he gets? No.

What I do take exception to is people not giving credit where it's due and just bashing him. There are lots on here who were very quiet through the times we've won and then one loss or draw and they're all over Rodgers like a rash. Flames has been the worst for this but to be fair to him he's been very consistent throughout unlike a lot on here.


You have indeed been a Rodgers loyalist and your defence of him was at times bordering on aggressive. It was only after the Palace and Stoke debacles that you finally saw what others had seen earlier.

There have been plenty who have defended Rodgers at the expense of flames through the season and anyone who supported flames' view was ridiculed by the usual suspects.

How quiet have they become since they realised Rodgers is not the manager they thought he was and that flames was right all along.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Wrong again sponge boy. I've never been a 'Rodgers loyalist' as you put it. He's always been a bit meh for me and I wanted Martinez over him. Do I care if he goes? No. Do I care if he stays? A little as with Klopp available I think it's a missed opportunity. Is that Rodgers fault and does he deserve the abuse he gets? No.

What I do take exception to is people not giving credit where it's due and just bashing him. There are lots on here who were very quiet through the times we've won and then one loss or draw and they're all over Rodgers like a rash. Flames has been the worst for this but to be fair to him he's been very consistent throughout unlike a lot on here.


You have indeed been a Rodgers loyalist and your defence of him was at times bordering on aggressive. It was only after the Palace and Stoke debacles that you finally saw what others had seen earlier.

There have been plenty who have defended Rodgers at the expense of flames through the season and anyone who supported flames' view was ridiculed by the usual suspects.

How quiet have they become since they realised Rodgers is not the manager they thought he was and that flames was right all along.


I support who ever is in charge and if I think someone is being out of order I'll tell them. Sorry if you don't like that but maybe you need to man up a bit. If that makes me a 'loyalist' in your definition of then maybe I was.

But ultimately I support LFC and who ever is there whether that's the manager, players, tea lady etc. I might not like them all but that's different. While they're here I'll support them. Doesn't mean I won't criticise where it's due but also give credit where due which I don't think Rodgers has had a lot of.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
Wrong again sponge boy. I've never been a 'Rodgers loyalist' as you put it. He's always been a bit meh for me and I wanted Martinez over him. Do I care if he goes? No. Do I care if he stays? A little as with Klopp available I think it's a missed opportunity. Is that Rodgers fault and does he deserve the abuse he gets? No.

What I do take exception to is people not giving credit where it's due and just bashing him. There are lots on here who were very quiet through the times we've won and then one loss or draw and they're all over Rodgers like a rash. Flames has been the worst for this but to be fair to him he's been very consistent throughout unlike a lot on here.


You have indeed been a Rodgers loyalist and your defence of him was at times bordering on aggressive. It was only after the Palace and Stoke debacles that you finally saw what others had seen earlier.

There have been plenty who have defended Rodgers at the expense of flames through the season and anyone who supported flames' view was ridiculed by the usual suspects.

How quiet have they become since they realised Rodgers is not the manager they thought he was and that flames was right all along.


I support who ever is in charge and if I think someone is being out of order I'll tell them. Sorry if you don't like that but maybe you need to man up a bit. If that makes me a 'loyalist' in your definition of then maybe I was.

But ultimately I support LFC and who ever is there whether that's the manager, players, tea lady etc. I might not like them all but that's different. While they're here I'll support them. Doesn't mean I won't criticise where it's due but also give credit where due which I don't think Rodgers has had a lot of.


Not sure what the highlighted bit is all about but good for you.

Being a loyalist is not a fault if the manager is performing well, but attacking those who dare to question him when he is not is little more than blind loyalty.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
It means if I think someone is being unfair then I'll say something about it. Rodgers has come in for a lot of unjustified stick. You could argue he deserves it being in the job he is and if you don't like what he's doing then fine, I've nothing against that. But opening threads calling him a cvnt in the title, p!ss taking of his teeth etc. I see no need for. If I 'attack' someone after that they should be able to take it if they're dishing it out.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908
We should rename this forum something like "I'm right and every body else is wrong". Well most people don't really give a flying duck about who said what ten months ago. Why can't we judge people according to what they do or fail to do? There's nothing wrong in changing an opinion due to a changing situation.

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion