KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Br pre QPR interview

You should never want your own team to lose for any reason. These last games are all pretty meaningless but I still want us to win them all. Rodgers will go soon enough if he deserves to.

We are 7 points behind 4th with 4 games to go... our form and the lack lustre performances on display, coupled with and away match at Chelsea tells me that boat has sailed.

My first point is completely true. You've taken one item I've said and ignored the rest that proved your post was completely hypocritical because you had no argument against it. Very transparent I'm afraid.

There is no debate, it is a fact, Suarez is the no.1 reason we finished 1st last year. That's why without him and 120 million to spend we will finish between 5th and 8th. The fact that you try to reference some fake debate that doesn't exist for anyone but yourself is the sorry tactics of "someone desperate to stand by an opinion. Which is hypoticrital in itself when that is what you accuse me of" to use the phrase you so helpfully and incorrectly threw at me, thank you for that.

My "balanced" argument was in parts subjective thats why I said "I'm trying to construct a balanced argument", and nowhere did I mask subjectivity with objectivity. There were facts AND opinions in the post, I'm sorry you got upset by the caps but it appears you needed your hand held through how a post can contain facts as well as opinion so maybe I should have used more. Perhaps a colour system next time? You attack my use of 'one piece of trivia' when I deliberately used it (and said as much) to demonstrate how your trivia was meaningless which you then go on to say yourself(!) making your attack an incredibly "amusing to read" attack that betrayed yourself.

It's clear you got upset thinking I was trying to dismiss you, but I wasn't at all, I directly addressed you, you're entitled to your opinion on Rodgers staying or leaving and I never said it was a FACT that he should go. So that's either a mistake or (another) lie on your part as you got upset at not having something substantial to back yourself up.

"Critiquing my words with a fine tooth comb" is when my eyes started to roll, for someone so well spoken that's an incredibly school boy error to turn to such a phrase when someone challenges a point you made. I challenged the actual point you made not the wording, if you later realise you misrepresented you position that's your error (another one).

His failure in the transfer market is what I called irrefutable, the evidence is the failure of nearly every one of his signings thus far. The 1/2 (that's one OR two, though here I can see where your confusion arose) in 10 I didn't call a fact, it is my "OPINION" but again I'm surprised you need your hand held through that. And again, you clearly got upset by me challenging your points but I wasn't picking your argument apart so your clear emotional reaction seems odd to me, and you I see you have tried to do that to me but you've hopelessly failed whilst making very rudimentary errors that perhaps if you let yourself cool off you wouldn't have done.

Your point about hypocrisy was that people who criticise Rodgers don't give him credit for last season. I gave him credit and blame for the respective seasons directly and very obviously so in saying "my point about hypocrisy bears great truth in most of what you say, so thanks for backing up my argument subconsciously" has no foundation and you've once again (rather comicly, again) hung yourself with your own petard. My post to you was to demonstrate your hypocrisy in not apportioning blame to Rodgers but giving him enormous credit that the evidence suggests might have been to much, and in your quite emotional rant you didn't manage to provide anything to disprove that. Thus ranting and raving without addressing the post at all really.

My first point is completely true. You've taken one item I've said and ignored the rest that proved your post was completely hypocritical because you had no argument against it. Very transparent I'm afraid.

There is no debate, it is a fact, Suarez is the no.1 reason we finished 1st last year. That's why without him and 120 million to spend we will finish between 5th and 8th. The fact that you try to reference some fake debate that doesn't exist for anyone but yourself is the sorry tactics of "someone desperate to stand by an opinion. Which is hypoticrital in itself when that is what you accuse me of" to use the phrase you so helpfully and incorrectly threw at me, thank you for that.

My "balanced" argument was in parts subjective thats why I said "I'm trying to construct a balanced argument", and nowhere did I mask subjectivity with objectivity. There were facts AND opinions in the post, I'm sorry you got upset by the caps but it appears you needed your hand held through how a post can contain facts as well as opinion so maybe I should have used more. Perhaps a colour system next time? You attack my use of 'one piece of trivia' when I deliberately used it (and said as much) to demonstrate how your trivia was meaningless which you then go on to say yourself(!) making your attack an incredibly "amusing to read" attack that betrayed yourself.

It's clear you got upset thinking I was trying to dismiss you, but I wasn't at all, I directly addressed you, you're entitled to your opinion on Rodgers staying or leaving and I never said it was a FACT that he should go. So that's either a mistake or (another) lie on your part as you got upset at not having something substantial to back yourself up.

"Critiquing my words with a fine tooth comb" is when my eyes started to roll, for someone so well spoken that's an incredibly school boy error to turn to such a phrase when someone challenges a point you made. I challenged the actual point you made not the wording, if you later realise you misrepresented you position that's your error (another one).

His failure in the transfer market is what I called irrefutable, the evidence is the failure of nearly every one of his signings thus far. The 1/2 (that's one OR two, though here I can see where your confusion arose) in 10 I didn't call a fact, it is my "OPINION" but again I'm surprised you need your hand held through that. And again, you clearly got upset by me challenging your points but I wasn't picking your argument apart so your clear emotional reaction seems odd to me, and you I see you have tried to do that to me but you've hopelessly failed whilst making very rudimentary errors that perhaps if you let yourself cool off you wouldn't have done.

Your point about hypocrisy was that people who criticise Rodgers don't give him credit for last season. I gave him credit and blame for the respective seasons directly and very obviously so in saying "my point about hypocrisy bears great truth in most of what you say, so thanks for backing up my argument subconsciously" has no foundation and you've once again (rather comicly, again) hung yourself with your own petard. My post to you was to demonstrate your hypocrisy in not apportioning blame to Rodgers but giving him enormous credit that the evidence suggests might have been to much, and in your quite emotional rant you didn't manage to provide anything to disprove that. Thus ranting and raving without addressing the post at all really.

Your demeaning attitude is actually quite amusing, I'll give you that. The rest is blathering nonsense. Don't expect much else from you in future. But thanks for wasting your time. It's actually quite reassuring.