KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

Three independent sets of consultants concluded a new stadium on Stanley park was viable and this was in the days before the game became awash with TV money

So what's changed ?

So why wasn't it done by those who commissioned the study then?

Moores did not have the money so sold out to potential owners who hopefully did have the resources one set of owners were called gillet one was called hicks and the third Henry not one of them had the resources and bought the club on a falsehood. The three consultants conclusions were right just we have been led down the path by inadequate internal management who sold us to [oops] men who had no more resources than David moores and we have wasted 15 years for nothing, That's the long and short of it vish

If it was viable then why did Moores need money that he didn't have, he could just have taken a long term loan as you have been suggesting.

Moores was in ill health and wanted out. With hindsight knowing what we know now I wish he had moores he was clueless commercially but loved the club. With someone like David dein running the club for moores we certainly could have financed the new stadium but the thought was we would get someone like DIC instead we ended up with the three stooges

It looks like none of the owners were ready to take the risk, in fact, you are the one who want FSG to take the risk, probably because it's not your money.

Page 100

Vish is your latest desperate attempt to tell me that unless I can finance the stadium personally myself then I have no right to an opinion on the club I have followed since 1963 and season ticket holder for 25 years?

What next only posters who have managed a premiership club can post on koptalk ?

Moores wanted out through ill Heath had we got DIC I think we would have had a stadium years ago. Gillet hicks and Henry are all of the same cloth I don't think any of them had any intention of developing anfield as it would involve an element of risk something they were not prepared to do.

I have high aspirations for the club. I also am realistic and not sitting back giving out and praying for a sugar daddy. The stadium will not be the main source of funding going forward regardless of the size.

Being, in my opinion, unrealistic and unwilling to accept the short term damage that your hopes for a new stadium may do does not make you a better fan than someone who has a different view to you. It's pathetic backslapping to start trying that argument

So you're saying none of them had any intention to develop anfield despite giving out for 100 pages that FSG are redeveloping anfield?