KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

The infrastructure is being planned now so this is a once in a lifetime opportunity the road infrastruture could be designed to accomodate an extra 25k in the future if its needed. All roads are built in this was they never build inftrasture to what exists currently. To start again in 15 years on another ground would not only be a collasal waste of money it probably would never go through planning.

Its affordable and hopefully once you have had chance to understand what is happening in the city your football club plays in then you might see where I am coming from. If Liverpool was a dead declining city then yes you would be right but its not.

Heres one to throw in perhaps contraversal

Lets say we get £100m for Suarez

Rather than do a spurs and sploge it on 4 carlos kickaballs why not put the money to a new stadium? What better legacy for such a great player. Yes it will impact the team but its going to do that anyway whoever we get he is one of the worlds best players perhaps the best at the moment.

I said Juve, Benfica, Dortmund had no problem attracting sponsors. You argue the opposite. Dont twist my words.

Alao, all of those clubs have more trophies than your City and Chelsea type clubs.

Also Bayern has a stadium that fits 70k, not that much more than ours will. The Allianz arena is no 90k mega stadium you are dreaming of. What have the 70-75k olimpiastadion, studio olimpico, millennium stadium done for their respective clubs? Has Cardiff suddenly caught up with united? Does Cardiff attract more sponsors than us? Do they have higher gate receipts than us? Has Roma got more sponsors? Higher gate receipts? Has Hertha Berlin got more sponsors?

You have quite some cheek calling Benfica and Juventus second rate clubs when they have always been top rate clubs.

You are making up stuff again and twisting words. Nothing new.

You do know your wasting your time Marko?

Yeah, but its the weekend and i figure i have some time to spare. but you are right. I will ignore this thread from now on.

Marko sorry pal not only is it not a proposition it's already built not the entire 30 year project but the inland ports (the core of the operation linking Manchester and Liverpool) are already operating along with sub projects like the waterfront project, Wirral ports and the new cruise liner terminal

Last post on this threads. Stanley, you are making sh1t up again. Roads are built with current carrying capacity in mind and needs for the next 10 years. Not 50 years. Spaces are left on the sides where any building is forbidden as that space will be used if further expansion is needed. so, in ten years we could easily reanalyze the situation. So more nonsense from you. You oughta stop it before you start believing it.

Thank you for providing me with so much ammunition in this discussion on the topic.

Rubbish. The site itself says it is a proposition. Woulda company or project falsely advertise itself as a proposition? I suspect the ports were smaller projects and not anywhere near 50 billion. You can twist it however you want, but you are mistaken.

Goodnight, i have a match to go and watch. Come on Ecuador