Quick Links: Liverpool FC Forum | ShoutBox | Podcast | KopTalk.TV | Upgrade to VIP forums

Register Log In

KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Page 6 of 103

1

2

…

4

5

6

7

8

…

102

103

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? EnergisedReds #416411 10/06/14 05:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU Stanley Park Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park Liverpool Legend Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU	Originally Posted By: vish LFC Originally Posted By: Stanley Park The other owners did do it commercial revenue rose under moores and gillet and hicks Commercial revenue probably did rise but why is it that United did a much better job while we were the dominating force not only in England, but Europe? How did United afford to increase their seat capacity and we kept watching? Because they were better than us and at commercial they are still better than us IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Stanley Park #416413 10/06/14 05:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 4,307 Ireland M Maxi88 Under 23 Player
Maxi88 Under 23 Player M Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 4,307 Ireland	Did the previous owners do as good a job, better a job or worse at developing commercial revenues than FSG?

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Stanley Park #416414 10/06/14 05:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU Stanley Park Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park Liverpool Legend Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU	Also vish Manchester unites bigger capacity has been a major factor in the commercial side IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Maxi88 #416416 10/06/14 05:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU Stanley Park Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park Liverpool Legend Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU	Originally Posted By: Maxi88 Did the previous owners do as good a job, better a job or worse at developing commercial revenues than FSG? Slightly worse but nothing to shout about IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Stanley Park #416419 10/06/14 05:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 22,926 EnergisedReds Liverpool Legend
EnergisedReds Liverpool Legend Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 22,926	Originally Posted By: Stanley Park Also vish Manchester unites bigger capacity has been a major factor in the commercial side No don't think so, it's their success on the field that has been THE factor in the commercial side and those managing the commercial side. However, the bigger capacity has helped the match day revenues and I am sure they would have the lowest cost per seat by just redeveloping/extending, instead of a brand new stadium.

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? EnergisedReds #416420 10/06/14 05:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU Stanley Park Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park Liverpool Legend Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU	Originally Posted By: vish LFC Originally Posted By: Stanley Park Also vish Manchester unites bigger capacity has been a major factor in the commercial side No don't think so, it's their success on the field that has been THE factor in the commercial side and those managing the commercial side. However, the bigger capacity has helped the match day revenues and I am sure they would have the lowest cost per seat by just redeveloping/extending, instead of a brand new stadium. If you go to Manchester on a match day (I go shopping) there are fans all over clutching merchandise Manchester United have redeveloped their ground but it's 75k and likely to go to £90k eventually. Liverpool max 58k Last edited by Stanley Park; 10/06/14 05:22 PM. IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Stanley Park #416421 10/06/14 05:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 22,926 EnergisedReds Liverpool Legend
EnergisedReds Liverpool Legend Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 22,926	Originally Posted By: Stanley Park Originally Posted By: vish LFC Originally Posted By: Stanley Park The other owners did do it commercial revenue rose under moores and gillet and hicks Commercial revenue probably did rise but why is it that United did a much better job while we were the dominating force not only in England, but Europe? How did United afford to increase their seat capacity and we kept watching? Because they were better than us and at commercial they are still better than us Exactly and that was in Moores time when we were dominating Europe. With owners like FSG then, we would have gone far ahead. When they took over we were in [oops] as you know, already out of CL and no money to invest in players, no money to pay bank interests. Adidas dumped us because they didn't want to pay enough because we were out of CL, it's FSG or managers appointed by them that got Warriors, Standard Chartered and the likes

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Stanley Park #416422 10/06/14 05:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 22,926 EnergisedReds Liverpool Legend
EnergisedReds Liverpool Legend Joined: Jan 2010 Posts: 22,926	Originally Posted By: Stanley Park Originally Posted By: vish LFC Originally Posted By: Stanley Park Also vish Manchester unites bigger capacity has been a major factor in the commercial side No don't think so, it's their success on the field that has been THE factor in the commercial side and those managing the commercial side. However, the bigger capacity has helped the match day revenues and I am sure they would have the lowest cost per seat by just redeveloping/extending, instead of a brand new stadium. If you go to Manchester on a match day (I go shopping) there are fans all over clutching merchandise Manchester United have redeveloped their ground but it's 75k and likely to go to £90k eventually. Liverpool max 58k You said yourself that fans can't see games properly in that stadium and I am sure you know that United has been building step by step. You want a new 75000 seater that even United cannot afford right now. It's good to be passionate, but some realism would help.

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? EnergisedReds #416423 10/06/14 05:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU Stanley Park Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park Liverpool Legend Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU	Vish you are not making sense did FSG get the sponsorship deals because they had slicker tongues did they smile at them nicely ? The reason we are getting the deals now I'd because the sponsors want to because the game has taken off commercially it's different to moores day. IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Re: What have FSG brought to the table ? Stanley Park #416424 10/06/14 05:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU Stanley Park Liverpool Legend
Stanley Park Liverpool Legend Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 27,628 Not the EU	Vish Man United fill that stadium fir prem games it is a bad view in parts but so is anfield and I am sure the new anfield will be worse IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Page 6 of 103

1

2

…

4

5

6

7

8

…

102

103

Moderated by KopTalk Team

Link Copied to Clipboard

Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.

Advertisements

Liverpool FC Discussion

Jude Law set to play Bill Shankly in Liverpool drama series
by Dunk - 16/10/26 08:07 PM

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1