KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

So you really think it's a good idea? Do you think if were not successful on the field that we will fill out a 90000 stadium?

At the beginning of last season that very same person was saying that we won't fill 45k stadium let alone 60 or 90k, bu11ocks I say. Depression does get people to talk nonsense sometimes.

No both go hand in hand vish is right we need to get the short term right where we disagree is I believe you should also plan for the medium to long term as well

It's all about resources and when they are limited you need to make a choice which should be short term first and then the rest. Even when somebody has a cancer and is bleeding, you stop the bleeding first and then try to cure the cancer. This is pure sense and logic.

You need an end to end plan vish

You don't build a stadium planning for the next five or ten years surely you have to see that ?

And I am glad you said resources had we got owners who had resources we would not be in this position but we have and we are

Hence we need to fund over the longer term and maximise any supporting finances we can be that naming rights city funding or whatever

How many times I've told you that unfortunately no Sugar Daddy was or is lining up to buy us, so FSG is what we have which is better than the Gladzers at least. I am sure that FSG have looked at the most viable option whether you like it or not as building the stadium including naming rights was the initial option. For the club, with the available resources, I am convinced Anfield expansion is the best option

91 pages...

This thread has generated 91 bleedin' pages

Vish I am well aware FSG are not sugar daddies but as I have said there are plenty options to fund a proper long term solution for our stadium other than thinking short term, If I was FSG then I would go for a stadium refurbishment and at the least cost I could get away with.

But I am not FSG am I ?

I am a Liverpool fan who cares about birth the club and the city which to me are symbiotic and our futures are inextricably linked and as the city expands so should the club

So it’s a case of death by a thousand cuts instead of by one? I suppose a masochist would opt for the slow death, but most thinking folk presented with such a choice would opt for the lesser of the two evils.

Building a stadium too small and without scope fir future expansion would see the club gradually falling behind the Manchester clubs in particular but some people don't care as it will be in 10 years time