KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 63 of 103 1 2 … 61 62 63 64 65 … 102 103
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
I don't mind hearing what other posters have to say about it because I only know for sure that Stanley and Annefield are against it.

What's making it a joke is the fact that Stanley keeps trying to bombard his views onto us or simply needs the last word

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Maxi88
Because 150mil = 500mil ....


No but over 30 years its peanuts and Maxi I thought you had more in your locker than that.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
theres not much point talking to you about it anymore to be honest

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
To put this whole thing in some kind of perspective Liverpools turnover is almost £200m a year assuming no inflation no growth that would still bring in £6 billion over 30 years. Yes I know we have costs as well but that shows the insignificance of the sums we are talking about. And that assumes we cannot get a penny in naming rights or sponsorship or grants for the ground we have to finance every penny ourselves. And FSG cannot afford to risk a further £350m !

A tragedy for the club


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
Let's just leave it at that shall we? We all know your thoughts on the subject stan.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
Let's just leave it at that shall we? We all know your thoughts on the subject stan.


I just want to say one more thing debt.

People say we dont want to take on debt the debt of clubs like Man utd and ours under Gillet and Hicks are not trsding debts but financing debts e.g the owners use the assets of the club to borrow against and use the cash to reimburse themselves for buying the club a practice I think should be illegal. Thats a million miles away from trading debt used to generate future growth thats normal business practice used by probably every company in the world.

Last edited by Stanley Park; 19/06/14 04:43 PM.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Annnnnnnnnnnnd.. we're done. tired

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084


That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
To put this whole thing in some kind of perspective Liverpools turnover is almost £200m a year assuming no inflation no growth that would still bring in £6 billion over 30 years. Yes I know we have costs as well but that shows the insignificance of the sums we are talking about. And that assumes we cannot get a penny in naming rights or sponsorship or grants for the ground we have to finance every penny ourselves. And FSG cannot afford to risk a further £350m !

A tragedy for the club


Again you miss the the interest side, our turnover is lower than our cost and increasing the costs with intetest and capital repayment (at least 20m a year) could only be done through increasing tickets prices which you don't want and is also not right. As always you don't know what you are talking about. You are a real tragedy here.

Last edited by vish LFC; 19/06/14 06:26 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Vish what's Liverpool's currently maintainable profit after exceptional items ? And the accounts how long after a financial year are they published for example do the current accounts include the huge losses from your mate king wonder manager dalglish

If it's an ongoing loss then we should be addressing that not even refurbishing anfield. And can you explain why the only extra revenue possible is increasing ticket prices ? I don't understand that one at all.

And can you explain why Manchester uniteds turnover is almost double ours might that be something to do with their bigger stadium for the last 20 years increasing all channels of revenue including sponsorship.

And by the way telling me I don't know what I am talking about does not make your points any more convincing my friend

Last edited by Stanley Park; 19/06/14 07:59 PM.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Page 63 of 103 1 2 … 61 62 63 64 65 … 102 103

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion