KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
KingoftheKop #363852 02/09/13 08:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,229
D
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
D Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,229
Originally Posted By: KingoftheKop
Why would Lukaku be a good loan option and Ba not? Other than the loan fee for Ba being stupid money. Lukaku is a big lad, but would fit better into our system than Demba Ba? crazy

Lukaku being different to what Everton already have doesn't seem to have put them off.

I can only assume you've all had your common sense glands removed! laugh


Lukaku IMO is a striker on the up and is only going to get better, Ba on the other hand is as good as he will get..

Derek #363879 02/09/13 10:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
So you'd rather we spent a year improving a striker for Chelsea's benefit than us take a proven goal scorer on loan for a year and reap the benefit? crazy

KingoftheKop #363881 02/09/13 10:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
G
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
If Danny, Suarez lose form, not available...,

Br is facked

And don't get me started on Aspas and Moses can play as a striker

KingoftheKop #363887 02/09/13 10:40 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
*
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
* Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
Originally Posted By: KingoftheKop
So you'd rather we spent a year improving a striker for Chelsea's benefit than us take a proven goal scorer on loan for a year and reap the benefit? crazy
laugh

am with kingofthekop on this. i think ba would have been a good signing to make as a loan

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion