|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 29
Trialist
|
|
Trialist
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 29 |
Suarez is lying obviously, sixties red. Why take the word of suarez over rodgers? Also... Why is Agger never included as a true loyal lfc player. It can be argued that he has been more loyal to lfc than gerrard. Never handed in a transfer request and it doesn't seem like he ever will. Hopefully fsg doesnt decide to sell him for profits 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
yep that's my point so to speak, the only way we could of got Suarez to sign a four yr ext at his age was by doing that clause in his contract now he realises that lfc are not going to allow negotiations on selling him hes p1zzed! dont agree with the way its all gone from the player but at the end of it its because were not going to be in the CL and unles 2 or 3 quality players come in we could be struggling for a berth this year too so were going to have probs getting top players, the problem then snowballs down the hill hey? A massive pay rise is why he signed a new contract not some none sense clause that means nothing. Why take the side of Suarez? He's done nothing but try and make mugs of all of us all season. If he wanted to leave he should have just said so and wait for his chance not all this bull sh!t in the press.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791 |
So, Torres, Meireles and now Suarez have all stated that the clubs 'broken promises' have been there reason for wanting to leave the club.
Personally i feel this has to affect the clubs chances of bringing in players, I know if i was a top player and promised the world by LFC i would be unsure weither to take there word or not.
If 3 top players have forced there way out surely you would be abit uneasy and this would be a factor on weither you join or not ? suarez was promised nothing . in the contract it says if lfc don't reach CL then if offers of 40 mil occur we will negotiate to a fair conclusion ! i cant see any negotiations! but i do see statements of hes going nowhere which clearly contradict the clause in the contract as described by Taylor! so to me that is controversial, as i said be fore off the pitch Suarez is a jerk and dont like his comments but he does seem to have some grounds when the contract says we will negotiate and they don't!! I sort of agree with you but I think you have to look deeper. Yes it says we will negotiate until a fair conclusion, however it doesn't mean we have to negotiate with a rival. For us, selling toa rival for 4th cannot be viewed as a fair conclusion unless they stump up 80 mil. Also no offer has been submitted by Madrid so we can't negotiate with them, and if they were to offer now, it's to late to find a replacement, so again, hardly a fair conclusion. Yes the club were very sly about the wording of the contract and Luis feels cheated, but these players and agents deal in such murky water and have taken clubs for a ride so many times, that I really have no sympathy for them. They should have been more careful when signing. They got taken, but they have done it before so it's their own mess to clean up.
Sign Reus
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791 |
Yeah if he wants to leaves bad, why has he not handed in a request? Not like he will starve without the payoff!
Sign Reus
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416 |
it says good faith negotiations, leaking details to a rival club and trying to leave on the cheap is not good faith but Suarez believes he is right, fair enough, its his opinion but it comes down in the clubs favour
"Romance has broke down
This boy is crack'in up"
So not a moderator
Valar Morghulis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Didn't Taylor say it isn't a buy out clause and wouldn't stand up in court? I truely beleive he hasn't taken legal action yet as he knows he's in the wrong and would loose. Just like in Holland.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446 |
why are we still talking about this? if suarez was in the right the PFA would have said so and suarez would be taking it to court. he's not because its all over. he can only hope that we sell him now.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,660
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,660 |
Promises, promises, do guys forget that these guys have contracts too.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
why are we still talking about this? if suarez was in the right the PFA would have said so and suarez would be taking it to court. he's not because its all over. he can only hope that we sell him now.
the buy out is dead its not there but the we will negotiate to a fair conclusion is in the contract so tell me who we are negotiating with when lfc says flat out hes not for sale can you not see that its a contradiction! we will negotiate but hes not for sale ? Difficult for me to understand why you are arguing that much about the interpretation of some kind of clause in Suarez contract. You don't know what's exactly written and even a lawyer won't be able to give an advice on what has been made public so far, so you better accept that the lawyers of LFC know what they are doing as they have all the information. Arguing on bits and pieces is completely futile IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
maybe be! but that's all we have vish and what we do have is contradictory as lfc have said not for sale which to me is no negotiations so why was the we will negotiate to a fair conclusion written into the contract as described by Taylor as for discussing this vish its a hot topic! but you can choose not to comment if you wish What's your point then, LFC doesn't know what they are doing? It is not possible to discuss a contract when you haven't seen the contract...but you can keep trying.
|
|
|
|
|
