we didn't have anything with moores - all he was interested in was sitting on his fat arse, playing with the silver spoon in his gob and creaming in profits off the club ....... he had chance after chance to take the club forward but refused to do anything that would personally cost him anything ...... morgan was willing to put his own money into the club - he was a massive improvement on what we had back then
thats not what i mean you've turned it in to name calling and comparing the 2 of them by their character. you know what i meant, we'll have no debt and no money to buy top players, with either of them in charge.....