KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,163
Bans should be given retrospectively. If a player says he was pushed/tripped then by all means give the freekick or penalty if you believe him. If a video evidence panel decide the next day that there was no contact then a 12 match ban and 1 month's salary fine should be enforced. The penalty for cheating must be a strong deterrant.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,104
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,104
I like that idea. Problem is, Suarez would be stuffed! But to be fair on the chap, he has had 2 or3 calls against him that should have been pens.

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 824
A
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
A Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 824
Originally Posted By: CarheeX
Bans should be given retrospectively. If a player says he was pushed/tripped then by all means give the freekick or penalty if you believe him. If a video evidence panel decide the next day that there was no contact then a 12 match ban and 1 month's salary fine should be enforced. The penalty for cheating must be a strong deterrant.


Totally agree on this one.

Also, the fourth official in the stands should have the benefit of a video replay. The ref is miked up so the fourth official could have a look (it doesn't take long) and let the ref on the pitch know which way to go. I doubt it would interfere with the speed of the game!

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion