Few things I noticed - mackenzie has apologised for the headline, but not for the contents of the article which for me were worse than the headline although others may care to disagree. So there was the journalist who pretends there was nothing wrong (at the time) in the article, it was the fault of the headline, and then mackenzie the editor saying it was the headline but no mention or apology for the content. Mackenzies just pretending he took the quotes /information in good faith, hmmm , time will tell...
Think this is going to escalate, thatcher in the clear she is half mad on her way out will escape any insinutations that she knew what was going on even though ingrams press secretary told her ... Wonder how many people escaped justice given the lapse of time..?
Last edited by Toothy; 12/09/12 03:04 PM.