KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
J
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
J Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
Originally Posted By: heggypompom
not doomed at all, we will surely buy in January and will probably get Sturridge for a cheaper price also, (if we go back in for him)

January transfer window will be very interesting


We didnt buy a striker last jan when it was needed, We didnt buy a striker this window when it was still needed.

A striker 1 year too late could very well be too late...

Suarez to leave in Jan I think.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Toothy
Under hicks and gillete we were paying interest on their purchase of the club. In the end the payments were so high the club lfc were paying off their f ups. It is not the same situation here


Explain why


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
You explain why its the same situation then. Instead of just saying its the same, prove it.

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
H
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
H Offline
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
and anfield to be repossessed

you make me smile


I will listen, only if your answer contains wisdom



Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
J
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
J Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,297
Originally Posted By: heggypompom
and anfield to be repossessed

you make me smile


You might not be far from the truth there...

Anfield sponsored by Standard Chartered was an option they considered....

FSG ARE PREPARED TO SELL THE SOUL OF THIS CLUB!

What's next the Champions League trophy on eBay to raise the coffers?

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Toothy
You explain why its the same situation then. Instead of just saying its the same, prove it.


I took 10 minutes this morning to explain it read my orginal post. If you have any questions then ask me I am always avaliable to answer questions.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
I can see whith my own eyes its not the same just on scanning the net , granted the data is never 100 pc reliable wherever its published ..

http://www.onebooker.com/en/2010/09/are-...-comes-to-debt/
this ones 2008-9 season LFC were paying 43million interest and profit was 12 million. Look at the link - the other clubs didnt have this massive discrepancy , most were running on even or profit.

Then the last figures i can find are in the guardian, for the season ending 2010,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/may/19/football-club-accounts-debt


liverpool were paying if the figures are correct 18 percent interest. Still too high but less than arsenal . Debt is 123 million. You are right in saying that nesv are different as they have the finances to clear all the debt. But why is this a bad thing? Damned it they do damned if they don't- But why should they? Its like a little kid saying to his dad you earn enough to buy me that 4000 pound bike. Why should be buy it?
Some fans need to grow up!

Last edited by Toothy; 01/09/12 01:24 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Toothy
I can see whith my own eyes its not the same just on scanning the net , granted the data is never 100 pc reliable wherever its published ..

http://www.onebooker.com/en/2010/09/are-...-comes-to-debt/
this ones 2008-9 season LFC were paying 43million interest and profit was 12 million. Look at the link - the other clubs didnt have this massive discrepancy , most were running on even or profit.

Then the last figures i can find are in the guardian, for the season ending 2010, liverpool were paying if the figures are correct 18 percent interest. Still too high but less than arsenal . Debt is 123 million. You are right in saying that nesv are different as they have the finances to clear all the debt. But why should they? Its like a little kid saying to his dad you earn enough to buy me that 4000 pound bike. Why should be buy it?
Some fans need to grow up!


You have totally missed the point its not about what debt LFC are paying there is no LFC. We are a wholly owned asset of FSG. You have not grasped the issue.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: Toothy
You explain why its the same situation then. Instead of just saying its the same, prove it.


I took 10 minutes this morning to explain it read my orginal post. If you have any questions then ask me I am always avaliable to answer questions.


You didnt explain it . Explain the different companies within lfc and the level of debt then you might start something constructive, and maybe bung in some figures instead of spouting non verifiable hear say mashed into a half baked prejudice!

Last edited by Toothy; 01/09/12 01:26 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
As far as I am aware LFC is a private limited company wholly owned by FSG. FSG financed £300m to buy it. That financing has a cost. Please try to understand before one of us dies.

Last edited by Stanley Park; 01/09/12 01:28 PM.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion