KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Can Liverpool fans trust FSG?

Who's to blame then?

Think those are unfair comparisons. How long were those clowns at the club compare to FSG. We all knew that the new owners were gonna need a little more time before things really start to change. The signings were entrusted with the Manager (Kenny), he crewd up not FSG. We cried for owners to support the Manager, we got them, no were back to the moaning.

Correction wasted £100m on players. Was that FSG's fault? well yes it was they appointed Dalglish and any reseach would have told them what they were going to get re his track record. Ask a Newcastle fan. And most of that £100m was on player sales not new investment. In fact their investment so far has been minimal.

If all would be honest, more then 90% of the fans wanted the appointment of Kenny, then he dissapointed, now it's back to blaming FSG.

They are not asset stripping but they might be just speculators keeping the club ticking over until the time is right to sell on. What would I like? A new stadium and substancial investment hundreds of millions. Man City spend a billion thats the order of magnatude you need to deal in these days. Our owners are small time boys big promises today in the liverpool echo but have they the means?

90-% of fans wanted Kenny ? Source please

I was one of the 10% and I was right this time last year when all the king kenny morons going on. One chappie predicted we would win the title last year with king kenny. I was in dispair last year not just with KK but how deluded some were and how out of touch.

I wasn't 'actually' suggesting we are worse off - my post doesn't say that anywhere. It was a 'devils advocate post', nothing more. Personally I'm delighted they have gone AND lost money in the process, but I have yet to see any evidence that we are much better off in footballing terms. The lingering debt has gone but we're further away from success.

We havent moved forward since they came in. No news on a new stadium and they've been here for almost 2 years!

Oh but dont worry they are going to sell the Anfield name to the highest bidder!

That should be the #1 concern. They cant compete and need to sell the Stadium naming rights to even come close.

i wouldnt be 100% against changing the stadium name if the money was going on a new stadium or revamping anfield. i rather have a anfield that has 60,000 seats and it being called sony anfield stadium and be competitive with our rivals then have 45,000 seats and have no chance of challenging them. we are at the moment living on past success but how long for? the big deals will dry up. we need a bigger stadium. it doesnt matter what they call it because we will still call it anfield

Right at the end of the video is a google-ad for "lose 4 stone in 3 months"....

I'm not sure why people are having a go at Dunc - at no point in this thread has he expressed an opinion as to whether he thinks we should or shouldn't trust FSG. He 'might' have reservations but to me, this topic looks like nothing more than a discussion point. What's the problem with that?