KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 13 14
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Agree with Stanley on this one. To try and gag Suarez is just out of order.

Sure the club will ask him to avoid speaking about it too much or going into too much detail, but to try and ban him completely isn't right. Especially when he continues to maintain his innocence about the things he has been deemed to have done and has been punished for.

The sad thing is that the club's request for Suarez to keep quiet is purely to protect their commercial interests rather than being based on any point of principle.

Suarez was treated unfairly in my opinion. Yes, he may have done something wrong. But there was insufficient evidence to support the ultimate conclusion and the process was questionable. The club's bungling of ths situation didn't help him either.

In any case, he hasn't said anything controversial. He's just given his view on a couple of things. I don't see any issues in what he has said. I'm willing to suffer a day or two's sensational articles in British newspapers if it means allowing Suarez his freedom of speech as long as he doesn't go too far.

Should we actively seek buyers like we are for Carroll? I think not.

Should we let him go if the club received an offer of £50 million plus? Probably.


'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly

'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
So Terry gets off on an open and shut racist case

Rio calls a fellow coloured played a choc ice and nothing is done.

Yet there are people on here condemning Suarez for looking at those two incidents and feelings harshly treated in his case.

You couldn't make it up.

Grow a pair lads, Suarez is absolutely right, there are 2 sets of rules in place when it comes to racism and the F.A.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,262
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,262
yep you way because Suarez is not English

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
So Terry gets off on an open and shut racist case

Rio calls a fellow coloured played a choc ice and nothing is done.

Yet there are people on here condemning Suarez for looking at those two incidents and feelings harshly treated in his case.

You couldn't make it up.

Grow a pair lads, Suarez is absolutely right, there are 2 sets of rules in place when it comes to racism and the F.A.


so suarez wasnt guilty of using racist language ?

C
craney91
Unregistered
craney91
Unregistered
C
Luis Suarez you complete and utter Solero!





I fancy one of those now! F*CK!

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
Originally Posted By: Rafarendum
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
So Terry gets off on an open and shut racist case

Rio calls a fellow coloured played a choc ice and nothing is done.

Yet there are people on here condemning Suarez for looking at those two incidents and feelings harshly treated in his case.

You couldn't make it up.

Grow a pair lads, Suarez is absolutely right, there are 2 sets of rules in place when it comes to racism and the F.A.


so suarez wasnt guilty of using racist language ?
As determined by whom? By the FA? Yes. Not by a court. You know that Tony Blair is a war criminal according to some, and Bin Laden is a hero according to others. It's not just about what someone, or some group determines another person is. You have to think for yourself a bit Faz. there was less proof in the Suarez incident than the Terry one, which didn't hold up in a legal court. So in a legal court, I think Suarez would have been cleared. I said we should fight it. Others like to surrender.
the F.A. thats good enough for me found guilty of racist and abusive language on a football pitch , and seriously what has bin laden and tony blair got to do with it ? and the hypocricy of it all is everyone wants terry and ferdinand banned but suarez was badly treated , look suarez admitted to the charge and was banned , but like suarez this conspiracy nonsense is laughable .

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Originally Posted By: Rafarendum
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
So Terry gets off on an open and shut racist case

Rio calls a fellow coloured played a choc ice and nothing is done.

Yet there are people on here condemning Suarez for looking at those two incidents and feelings harshly treated in his case.

You couldn't make it up.

Grow a pair lads, Suarez is absolutely right, there are 2 sets of rules in place when it comes to racism and the F.A.


so suarez wasnt guilty of using racist language ?
As determined by whom? By the FA? Yes. Not by a court. You know that Tony Blair is a war criminal according to some, and Bin Laden is a hero according to others. It's not just about what someone, or some group determines another person is. You have to think for yourself a bit Faz. there was less proof in the Suarez incident than the Terry one, which didn't hold up in a legal court. So in a legal court, I think Suarez would have been cleared. I said we should fight it. Others like to surrender.


To add to that. He wasn't punished for simply using racist language. His 8 game ban was so high because they decided that not only did he make reference to Evra' colour, but that he intended it to be abusive (which Suarez has always denied) and that he used it multilple times in and abusive manner (which Suarez has also always denied).


'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly

'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
look think hard it cannot be a nice thing to say when you have just be tackled if you have played or been involved in football at any level you would know this .

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
I think Suarez was pressurised by the club into admiting racisim (whatever that means) its clearly getting to him as he believes he was conned. And I don't blame him I would feel the same.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Well Faz if the opinions of the FA are good enough for you there is really no point in taking this discussion any further.

If you cant see the blatant discrimination when it comes to dealing with Suarez, Terry and Ferdinand then there is no hope for you.

I never said Suarez was innocent and he paid through the nose for his naievety as opposed to his racism.

But it was the FA that set the precedent when they gave Suarez such a ridiculously heavy ban and I for one will be interested to see how heavily they come down on two former England captains.

All I want is for Terry and Ferdinand to be treated in the same way that Suarez was treated.

Not special rights, just equal rights.

Page 4 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 13 14

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion