You're missing the point KD. It's about the fairness of the process.
Everyone knows something happened. Suarez admitted from day 1 that he used a particular Spanish word. However, he maintains that it was not intended as an insult, it certainly did not mean 'N1gger' as was the original accusation, it wasn't the English word of the same spelling, and he used it only once.
Yet without any sound or video evidence to prove what actually said, he was deemed guilty of saying something seven times in an abusive manner. Something which even Evra didn't claim he said and something which no one heard. Something for which he was then punished not just with an 8 game ban but with the bashing he got from the press and the public too.
Even if he said it a thousand times, I don't think it's right to reach a conclusion through guessing without clinching evidence in a matter which has serious repurcussions.
You say you saw him pinch Evra skin and say something and what do we think he said? The point is that we can think all we like. We might have strong suspicions of what he said. But the fact is the we don't know. There's nothing to prove exactly what he said.
You accuse him of raising the whole thing again. What is he supposed to say? If he still mainatins his innocence, why shouldn't he say so if asked the question?
If he is looking for a way out of the club and the country then so what? I wouldn't blame him. Sure he made mistakes but the club bungled the whole situation and let him down too.
He's not an angel. The chances are he did say something he shouldn't have. But whoever the accused is in any situation, in a civilised society we like to apply justice fairly at every step. And in this case, in my opinion there just wasn't enough evidence to reach the damming conclusion the panel arrived at.
