KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
H
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
H Offline
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,955
interesting point you have raised there, as we always take this for granted.


I will listen, only if your answer contains wisdom



T
thundyr
Unregistered
thundyr
Unregistered
T
Originally Posted By: TheMightyLFC
Agree. It's how it was in the old days. If I remember correctly, even new signings hardly ever went straight into the first team. You had to spend a few weeks on the sidelines, and a couple of bench appearances at least to earn a first team place.


If I recall correctly, Ian Rush barely played in his first season despite his hefty transfer fee, and he was so fed up with it he was tempted to move away. Ok, LFC was a much stronger club, but he had to earn his place. These days if you cost more than 5m you're immediately first team material, and if you don't work out you get sold just as immediately and no one even notices. I believe that Henderson would be a better player if he'd played half as many games as he has - once it was clear he wasn't a good RM he should have gone back to waiting for chances at CM the way Shelvey has since he came back from loan. Ditto Charlie Adam.

People missing games at the beginning of the season tend to take it in their stride. People missing games at the end of the season when they have been regular starters (like Adam, Downing, Carroll, Maxi, Kuyt) will lose heart as they can see their names on the transfer list rather than the team sheet.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,386
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,386
Well his playing against Newcastle today for the Res so at less his getting some much playing time

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion