Why is that any opinion that some people don't like is labelled as "knee-jerk". Debate the point. If you think he's good then say so, and say why, and when. But to just call everything knee-jerk is lazy and a waste of time.
I've seen him last season and this. Overall, he has had maybe one good game in that time, so I have a similar opinion of him as of Spearing, who has perhaps had 2 good games. Neither are good enough imo. It's not knee-jerk, it's an opinion over a year or more.
He could improve dramatically, it's possible I suppose. But unlikely. Kelly has what it takes. Robinson has more potential. Flanagan is one of the least promising I've seen, and yet Kenny plays him more than the others.
fair point rafarendum.but this was more to the title of the thread and not attacking anyone.peace.
