|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128 |
Stan were you juggling a medicine ball.
Though 6 equals a Dirk Kuyt first touch
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Stan were you juggling a medicine ball.
Though 6 equals a Dirk Kuyt first touch When you have had as many hard blows to the head as I have 6 is a fair total.
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128 |
A good clip round the ear never did me any harm.
Just ask my psychiatrist
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Not sure the last 2 points are down to Kenny
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
i will say good the cups
bad the league campaign
the embarrassing the suarez business
so as it stands the bad is outweighing the good . Proud of Dalglish standing up to the defamation and inequity of the FA, Ferguson, Evra, and the media. are you sure i think it was embarrassing actually , the after match rant the wearing of those tee shirts , think again mate , as for being better than hodgson well maybe but hodgson 6 wins at home dalglish 4 is that better ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
i will say good the cups
bad the league campaign
the embarrassing the suarez business
so as it stands the bad is outweighing the good . Proud of Dalglish standing up to the defamation and inequity of the FA, Ferguson, Evra, and the media. are you sure i think it was embarrassing actually , the after match rant the wearing of those tee shirts , think again mate , as for being better than hodgson well maybe but hodgson 6 wins at home dalglish 4 is that better ? Absolutely positive. I don't really want to open up that whole debate again but I can tell you that most people around the world thought the whole thing was ridiculous... and the FA and English media came out of it looking the most stupid and hypocritical. The whole thing was political and machiavellian... the sham moralism of the FA was in itself racist... and the overreaction to the Tshirts or people standing up for their rights of expression and free speech in the face of a kangaroo court and media witch-hunt was imbecilic. Dalglish and the team stood by their compatriot and why wouldn't they? The club capitulated somewhat when it became politically expedient to do so. The racial fingerpointing and targeting that exploded from it was embarrassing and counter-productive. Glad it's all over - but proud of Dalglish, who while not always expressing himself eruditely, at least had the testicular fortitude to fight against the injustice and hypocrisy of the whole thing. i think you mistaken i think the world thought dalglish and suarez was wrong and embarrassing its only blindfaith liverpool supporters who thought it was some sort of conspiracy .
Last edited by fazakerley red 1; 08/03/12 03:12 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Not so. I've travelled quite extensively recently and can assure you that most people were non-plussed by the treatment and denigration of Suarez and Liverpool. Thankfully the few fans that turned on their club and bought the media soundbites were a minority. I personally can't see how anyone could fall for that load of b0llocks! well mate i thin k your mistaken just look front page of the new york times and the washington post enough said .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Not so. I've travelled quite extensively recently and can assure you that most people were non-plussed by the treatment and denigration of Suarez and Liverpool. Thankfully the few fans that turned on their club and bought the media soundbites were a minority. I personally can't see how anyone could fall for that load of b0llocks! well mate i thin k your mistaken just look front page of the new york times and the washington post enough said . Yeah - a few of Murdoch's papers repeated the soundbites but it didn't have much traction with the populace. The Washington post is a joke rightwing paper anyway... thirdrate tabloidism for idiots! not murdoch papers gets facts right mate yes right wing but football(soccer) on there front pages never been seen or heard of before .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
The newspaper is owned by The Washington Post Company, an education and media company that also owns Kaplan, Inc., and many media ventures besides The Post.
The Ochs-Sulzberger family, one of the United States's newspaper dynasties, has owned The New York Times since 1896.[13]
not murdoch the new york post is news corp
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
As controlling shareholder in the News Corp he drives the feeds - and most columns are recycled from the AP or elsewhere.
Those stories didn't make much of a dent- and only ManU fans over here try to keep driving that bus. I wear my Suarez shirt everywhere and 9 times out of 10 all I get is empathy - or scathing comments about what a farce it all was.
new york post is news corp mate not the new york times , thew new york times are a shareholder in fenway so do you think a company that was involved with murdoch would be involved with LFC ? , plus doesnt matter this embarrassing bad story on there front pages never been seen or heard of , your just digging your self a into a big hole mate facts are on my side .
|
|
|
|
|
