|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
look it happened and this person got banned my point is , is it right for the club to do that for a complaint on hear say and then back an employee of the club when he has admitted using those sort of words ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416 |
No,that is not right but it is difficult to comment on a case that we know absolutely nothing about.
"Romance has broke down
This boy is crack'in up"
So not a moderator
Valar Morghulis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
No,that is not right but it is difficult to comment on a case that we know absolutely nothing about. well we know about the suarez case and as an employee of liverpool football club he has admitted using those sort of words against another person as the club say they are against any form of racism on or off the pitch .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279 |
no point discussing it further Faz. it really is pointless. you're either not reading what I've written, or you don't understand it (which may be my fault) or you're ignoring it.
Let's just agree to disagree.
what we can agree on is that I hope we go to Wembley and win a cup this year, and I hope we win the league soon!
'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly
'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
no point discussing it further Faz. it really is pointless. you're either not reading what I've written, or you don't understand it (which may be my fault) or you're ignoring it.
Let's just agree to disagree.
what we can agree on is that I hope we go to Wembley and win a cup this year, and I hope we win the league soon! so your happy to see the club back an employee when he has admitted using those words but on the other hand the club would ban you for doing similar is that right ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Good pouint Faz they lecture us 10 minutes before kick off a Anfield with that sermon which makes my blood boil. But do they read it out to the players in the dressing room like hell they do.
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,279 |
no point discussing it further Faz. it really is pointless. you're either not reading what I've written, or you don't understand it (which may be my fault) or you're ignoring it.
Let's just agree to disagree.
what we can agree on is that I hope we go to Wembley and win a cup this year, and I hope we win the league soon! so your happy to see the club back an employee when he has admitted using those words but on the other hand the club would ban you for doing similar is that right ? Faz, I'm trying not to be rude hence not going away without answering you, but this will really be my last attempt to get it through to you, but you can also read my previous posts: - the club was defending an employee who was initially accused of saying something he didn't ('N1gger 10 times') - the club then defended the player against being accused of saying something (Negro 7 times) in a racially abusive manner which he denied and for which there is no independent evidence - one use of the word Negro was admitted from the outset but the club believed that it was not the english negro but the spanish word, and that too said in a context that wasn't intended to be racially abusive. the club was entitled to hold this position until the hearing if it believed it to be true and particularly so in the absence of independent evidence to the contrary - we don't know that the club would confiscate a season ticket on the basis of one person's word against another. If it would then that's wrong too. Gotta go now. I'm sure we'll engage in another debate soon. Goodnight.
Last edited by TheMightyLFC; 03/01/12 04:48 AM.
'I was only in the game for the love of football - and I wanted to bring back happiness to the people of Liverpool.' Bill Shankly
'We should have made a signing or two in the last couple of transfer windows.' Vish
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Good pouint Faz they lecture us 10 minutes before kick off a Anfield with that sermon which makes my blood boil. But do they read it out to the players in the dressing room like hell they do. thats what i have been trying to put over , a paying supporters can be banned , but an employee is backed to the hilt , now ok the ban was severe but i was always expecting suarez to be banned.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416 |
I have heard that Anti racism crap they call out,I dont need to be told it as do most people but there just happens to be a lot of idiots in the world who do,the person faz know of who has been banned on someones word has been shafted by the club and if it is true,is very hypocritical.
"Romance has broke down
This boy is crack'in up"
So not a moderator
Valar Morghulis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Good pouint Faz they lecture us 10 minutes before kick off a Anfield with that sermon which makes my blood boil. But do they read it out to the players in the dressing room like hell they do. thats what i have been trying to put over , a paying supporters can be banned , but an employee is backed to the hilt , now ok the ban was severe but i was always expecting suarez to be banned. If one supporter was caught on camera insulting another supporter's sister in a vile way, and then threatening physical violence, and then the aggressive one CLAIMS that there was racism used with no evidence, then either the club would expel both and take their season tickers, or it would take away the season ticket of the aggressive one for starting trouble, and leave the non-aggressive one who there is no proof against. Now go to the Man U forum, and explain why Evra should never be allowed to play for Man U again, because a fan behaving like Evra would be banned. Good luck with that! You'll be laughed out of the forum. Like others, I too don't think the club would ban on only ONE person's hearsay without evidence. well they did and have .
|
|
|
|
|
