KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum Worth a £25m Gamble?

i never said he was going to knuckle down and become a model pro. the reason i would take him on loan and not on a permanent bases is with the loan we can tell him to f off at the 1st sight of trouble

no way...papis cisse would be perfect..

What's jovavic like, he was good against us a few years back, but who wasn't?
[/quote]

great player with bags of potential was slowly starting to run riot in seria a last season until a serious injury him him back but he seems to be slowly finding his feet again this season and has bagged quite a few in already at the ryt price i think hed be a great option and fits in with the current owners outlook young and talented and would say not overly priced

i heard jovetics contract runs out next year...

Ha, no way. Complete non-starter anyway. It'd not realistic for so many reasons.

cant just loan him and then f him off the first sign of trouble , deals are struck money changes hands .

faz, that wud be the best way forward for the club, player, ie...

do a loan deal for tevez in Jan 2012, if he plays well, keeps his mouth shut and causes no problems, then with a option to buy in the summer from City for 40m,...40m fee agreed b4 the loan deal starts, city will let him go, as they will be praying that tevez becomes a role model over the coming months.

in the real world, tevez on loan, wud be great, on a loan deal cuzz he cud be the difference in winning the EPL title or getting a CL place.

end of the season give him back to city or get city to drop the asking price.
do wat Juve did to us with aqualini

Well his agent has said that his family are now living in England and are settled which is news to me, and now apparently he's so settled he'd be willing to move to a new premier league club.

Looking at it Inter won't afford Tevez because they are losing so much money per yr that they have to sell to be able to meet the fair play rules and make the champions league. Hence the reason they sold Eto'o on the realtive cheap under 30 mil and bought Forlan for under 10 mil.

Milan have Ibra and a host of forwards.

Real have Higuiam and Benzema for one striker position,

Barca don't need Tevez and aren't interested at all

Chelsea bought Torres and have Drogba so obviously won't be after him.

City certainly don't want him but wouldn't be surpirsed if he stayed now

Man utd won't have him, again obvious reasons

That leaves Corinthians or Boca and if eithier want him they'll have to pay under 35 mil for him, although City will want roughly 40 mil.

This is completely unllike me but I think we'd have a very realistic shout of getting Tevez if we wanted him.

Considering we are enquiring about Hazard and he would cost upwards of 30 mil, and I know we probably need another winger before another finisher striker, but opportunities like this don't come along.

My thinking is if he stays beyond Christmas at City and doesn't play, it'll become a similar situation to adebayor or bellamy at city and maybe his price could drop to 20-30 mil by next summer, and if it means he'll be playing regularly I'm sure he would accept a wage drop as it would be required if he was to move to Boca or Corinthians.

The negatives are the cost and wages but imo we could manage them considering the team and squad we currently have. We bring in 40 mil each season in profits so we'd make fair play rules.

The positives more mass market in south america, proven premier league star quality player of Suarez's level. finally have a finisher since Torres left, and he's versatile and can play every attacking position.

Btw this is only for debate, because these sorts of situations seem to be gobbled up Harry Redknapp season after season with Adebayor, Van der Vaart, Gallas, Parker, all joining under similar situations.

1. This was talked about not even a week ago
2. Surely the fact that he is an absolute tw*t is a negative point
3. Just no, again referring to number 2

any reason this couldnt go into the other thread ?