|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Trialist
|
|
Trialist
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23 |
sorry, that was Fahad Bin Faisal Bin Abdullah.. he is the grand son of the current King.
wrong again because he isnt the grand son of King Abdullah.. to let everyone know about this guy he is Faisal bin Fahad bin Abdullah bin Mohammad bin Abdulrahman AlSaud.. he is not that much rich and not from the best part of this royal family but he is married to the Grand Daughter of King Abdullah.. i dunno if that would help.. but my sources in Saudia Arabia says that he is looking to build acadimies and help the saudi's youth to get better through these acadimies so its an investment oppourtunity more than injecting cash into the club i see the 25% stake more likely to happen if the owners wants to give this guy the oppourtunity to have the acadimies they will force him to to buy 25% of the club so they can repay their debts... and for the people who is asking which one better for us DIC or this guy i would say DIC all the way... unless we have a real prince from Saudia Arabia from the top level intersted in the club that would be better
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,521
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,521 |
The sea, will be the sea, whatever the drops philosophy!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 185
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 185 |
Just to help everyone out with the translation. This was Faisal Bin Fahad Bin Abdulaziz (son of the former King of Saudi Arabia). he said that "Tomorrow" we will sign with LFC owners, not a Memorandum of Understanding, but a Contract. he also said that the deal would result in buying 25-50% of LFC.
wrong person because Faisal bin Fahad bin Abdulaziz is dead... I realized that and corrected the info. It's weird that Koptalk news have reported that "Faisal Khaled" is the one who came to Anfield today. Haven't seen any photos yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
Just to help everyone out with the translation. This was Faisal Bin Fahad Bin Abdulaziz (son of the former King of Saudi Arabia). he said that "Tomorrow" we will sign with LFC owners, not a Memorandum of Understanding, but a Contract. he also said that the deal would result in buying 25-50% of LFC.
wrong person because Faisal bin Fahad bin Abdulaziz is dead... I realized that and corrected the info. It's weird that Koptalk news have reported that "Faisal Khaled" is the one who came to Anfield today. Haven't seen any photos yet. I'm stugglin' to keep up here tbh. Why can't you all's be called 'our Billy, or 'our Jimmy' out there? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,521
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,521 |
lol. It can be complicated.
Growler bin Andrew bin adbul aziz bim mohammed, means
Growler son of Andrew son of abdul aziz son of mohammed. lol
Chain reaction.
i think it was a silly rumour
The sea, will be the sea, whatever the drops philosophy!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,521
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,521 |
Here it is from news of the world with a picture of the prince, looks like a ladyboy... lol
ANFIELD WARZONE KOP MAN - George Gillett (left) at Anfield next to Prince Faisal Gillett and Hicks go head-to-head over club
OWNERS - George Gillett (left) and Tom Hicks Jermaine Pennant: Rafa Benitez wanted a machine Former Liverpool midfielder is off to flying start in Spain Read DAVID MOYES SNUBS LIVERPOOL WORLD CUP BID LIVERPOOL PURSUE £240M DEAL LIVERPOOL 6, HULL CITY 1
By CHRIS BASCOMBE, 26/09/2009
LIVERPOOL are the subject of a possible £200million investment from a Saudi billionaire - and that has re-ignited the bitter war between Tom Hicks and George Gillett.
The Anfield co-owners are still both trying to sell each other's half of the club.
Prince Faisal bin fahad bin Abdullah al Saud attended yesterday's 6-1 thrashing of Hull as a guest of Gillett and was even taken into the dressing room to meet the team.
Although he was aware of the Saudis' attendance, Hicks was not part of any of the discussions with or invitations to the Prince, who claims he will negotiate for as much as 50 per cent of the club.
Sources close to Gillett insist the Prince's visit was primarily about setting up Liverpool FC Academies in the Middle East, playing down the guest's investment talk.
But Sport of the World understands the invitation is part of ongoing efforts by the co-owners to oust the other from the Anfield boardroom. The pair are pursuing new co-investors separately. Prince Faisal, who was flanked by three bodyguards in the Directors' Box, is chief executive of F6, a marketing and investment company in Saudi Arabia.
He is the latest in a series of potential investors invited to Anfield.
His primary interest is in sports such as powerboat racing. He is president of Saudi Water Sports Federation and has shown little previous interest in football.
Ironically, Hicks has appointed financial advisors Merrill Lynch to seek millions from Saudi Arabia and across the Middle East. Again, he has acted independently from Gillett.
Gillett is currently in a stronger financial position than his co-owner, having sold the Montreal Canadians ice hockey side for around £360m. Hicks has consistently flexed more muscle in his boardroom power struggles.
He has overseen the appointment of managing director Christian Purslow, forced through the five-year extension to Rafa Benitez's contract and the departure of ex-chief executive Rick Parry.
Last year, owners of the Delhi Daredevils Indian Premier League club were wined and dined by Hicks.
Leaked documents compiled by Merrill Lynch and sent to potential investors last March underline why Liverpool are still desperate for investment.
Until they raise the funds to build the new stadium on Stanley Park, the club will continue to lose as much as £55m per year in matchday income.
Despite this, manager Benitez has been assured a £100m kitty over the next five years, providing Liverpool consistently reach the last 16 of the Champions League.
Qualifying for the group stages of the competition has long been Benitez's minimum requirement to raise funds.
But he must ensure Liverpool are in the knockout stages every season until 2014 to preserve his current £20m-a-year net spend. The club's ambitious budgeting is a consequence of Benitez achieving this goal in every season since his arrival.
Liverpool have failed to progress into the quarter-finals just once since his move to Merseyside in 2004.
And a win over Fiorentina in Italy in midweek would go a long way to securing a safe passage this season, too, preserving his spending power next summer.
The transfer vow, although heavily incentivised through on-field performance, is partially reassuring to Kop fans, especially as this figure will grow if Liverpool reach the later stages or win the competition.
Both Hicks and Gillett are increasingly hitting back at claims they have failed to invest in the team since their controversial takeover three years ago.
Sources close to the duo say they are baffled at the unfavourable financial comparisons with Arsenal and Manchester United, who they insist they have outspent since taking over Liverpool.
The club's own study into transfer activity revealed how, up until the end of last season, the Merseysiders had splashed out £205.3m on players since 2004, recouping £98.75m from sales.
That figure does not take into account an estimated £10m invested on youth players over the same period.
Fans desperate for the Americans to sell their stake have warned about the club becoming the next Leeds United, but club insiders dismiss those fears.
Gillett was confronted by angry fans at Liverpool's Academy yesterday morning, when he launched a stern defence of his role at the club and refuted claims of financial instability.
A Kop source told Sport of the World: "It's nonsense to suggest Liverpool is going the same way as Leeds.
"The documents leaked are out of date. They were written last November and don't take into account the refinancing last summer or the record sponsorship deal we've just completed, but you can see how prudent the club is being.
"We are not spending above our means and the targets set were based on the last five years' income.
"A net spend of £20m per season compares favourably with our top four rivals. You only have to look at what Liverpool, Arsenal and Manchester United have spent over the same period to see that."
However, the latest developments underline how fragile the recent truces are. And there could be further divisions ahead over the appointment of a new chief executive.
Gillett is anticipating a shortlist for Parry's replacement to be drawn up as early as next week and sees Purslow's role as merely transitional.
The managing director has been commuting from London twice a week since joining the club, although his exceptional performance so far means he is likely to take a broader, long-term role.
The sea, will be the sea, whatever the drops philosophy!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
I'll read all that when I've next got a day off. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 933
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 933 |
We've been filling our cars with petrol for years & have made the Saudi's rich. About time they fed some back.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 933
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 933 |
I do not have any opinion on Saudi Arabia, but the UK Government & the Queen have a known relationship with the country. A lot of British companies work in Saudi, including defence firms.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,007
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,007 |
Guys, let's just leave the politics outta of the game this time. If the prince invests and helps us grow our brand name in the Middle East, great.
I'm not looking for a richer millionaire or billionaire. They all have money, some richer than others. As long that that freaking stadium is built so that we can be self sufficient for a long time and Rafa is backed to signed his 1st choices, i will be happy for whoever to come in.
|
|
|
|
|