|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,386
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,386 |
55,000 capacity Anfield or a brand new 80,000 capacity stadium??
Which one do you prefer guys??
If we decide to build a new stadium then i think the money would be loaned and the club would be in debt like valencia..and may not have enough money to spend on the players which must be our top priority...
So, what do you guys say?? anfield or new stadium?
‘There are only two sides in Liverpool – one is red and one is blue and the blue side are the reserves.’
-Bill Shankly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 188
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 188 |
Not sure really  if we could fill 80,00 or even near enough than maybe. I no that ppl don't want a new stadium because of the magnificent history we have at anfield but if we build a new stadium it will be the start of the new Liverpool era. Totally ,undecided mate 
Fruitella is a badman sweet you get me?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464 |
if stanley park is less then 80,000 then stay at anfield and increase it but i read old plans wanting a 60,000 seater which makes no sence paying all that money for 15,000 seats when you could get near tht by expanding anfield also if we move to a new stadium the naming writes will be sold which helps sell them to adidas call it the Triple A Arena - Adidas Anfield Arena
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
Anfield. Close thread. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422 |
am not sure we need a 80,000 seater stadium. i think for the moment 60 maybe 65,000 will be more then enough but with the option of maybe extending it a further 10k
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 906
Under 18 Player
|
|
Under 18 Player
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 906 |
New stadium but only at 80k, but I know we'll be properly f'd if we do go for a new stadium and we'll have to shelf becoming a force in Europe for a while let alone england once construction starts for new stadium if choosen.
Fsg are rich but no way near enough to keep this amount of spending we're doing this summer up, even spending when we need to will become a task.
Once construction starts we'll be back to the 2nd to last year under Rafa where we sold Xabi and had a net spend of 10-20 mil.
With this in mind I believe Renovating Anfield is the only option to keep our progress for top 4 and eventualy a title to regular challengers to a force in Europe over the comign years. Because lets be honest in the next 4 years we're going to have to spend another 50-80mil in a season to recycle our team with youth from the youth team.
Upcoming world class players IMO for 2014 WORLD CUP: K-P Boateng, Gotze, Sturridge, Kroos, Lucas Leiva, Hummels, Kyriakos Papadopoulos,
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308 |
no it's not.......
Im for staying at anfield. This rubbish that we need to move is something i dont get....We can expand anfield to above 50,000 easy so why spend, god knows how many millions on a new stadium to get a 60,000 seater. Which is what the plans said last time. Then have this effect the clubs debt and transfer fund. How much money will 10,000 extra really generate.?
dont be an hater, take the banter!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422 |
no it's not.......
Im for staying at anfield. This rubbish that we need to move is something i dont get....We can expand anfield to above 50,000 easy so why spend, god knows how many millions on a new stadium to get a 60,000 seater. Which is what the plans said last time. Then have this effect the clubs debt and transfer fund. How much money will 10,000 extra really generate.? i would say atleast 9m a year and if we get into europe then 11m. in a space of ten years it could be as much as 90 -110m. thats not money to be sniffed at
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464 |
no it's not.......
Im for staying at anfield. This rubbish that we need to move is something i dont get....We can expand anfield to above 50,000 easy so why spend, god knows how many millions on a new stadium to get a 60,000 seater. Which is what the plans said last time. Then have this effect the clubs debt and transfer fund. How much money will 10,000 extra really generate.? not 100% accurate but lets say 19 prem games 10 europe and 10 other cup games so around 40 games give or take how well we do in cups and europe and say £20 a ticket for each around an extra 8 mill a year then extras while at anfield will bring that upto around an 10 mill easy i dont think am aiming to high tbh mean we will have an extra 200,000 a week
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 308 |
what?....10,000 extra fans will generate 9mil a year extra?....how just with ticket sales. i can see profit is there to be made but at what cost to the transfer funds and sqaud and how long for?????
Last edited by 79ceb; 18/06/11 04:55 AM.
dont be an hater, take the banter!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|