KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
murph75 #129555 08/06/11 08:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Originally Posted By: murph75
Originally Posted By: House
Originally Posted By: murph75
Originally Posted By: House
nope, that midfield is embarrassing and would get ripped apart by any half decent team.


Seeing as you know everything lets see your line up than just pick faults at others.



kuyt/mata gerrard lucas downing


Thats a great midfield.


great? no. but it's balanced and would work very well with our current strike force.

House #129569 08/06/11 08:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Its weak in my opnion. I am still allowed to have one am I?

...........Raul Henderson.........
..............Gerrard............
...........Carroll Sauarer.......

We still need width though.


"There's no golden ring at the end of the ride... it's all bullsh*t." Tommy Gavin
murph75 #129571 08/06/11 08:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Originally Posted By: murph75
Its weak in my opnion. I am still allowed to have one am I?

...........Raul Henderson.........
..............Gerrard............
...........Carroll Sauarer.......

We still need width though.


how many midfielders you having 3,4,5? either way having meireles, henderson and gerrard through the middle is far too attacking.

House #129574 08/06/11 08:43 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Originally Posted By: House
Originally Posted By: murph75
Its weak in my opnion. I am still allowed to have one am I?

...........Raul Henderson.........
..............Gerrard............
...........Carroll Sauarer.......

We still need width though.


how many midfielders you having 3,4,5? either way having meireles, henderson and gerrard through the middle is far too attacking.


Isnt the object of the game to score more than the oppostion?! Why do we have to play with a defensive midfielder?!


"There's no golden ring at the end of the ride... it's all bullsh*t." Tommy Gavin
murph75 #129575 08/06/11 08:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Originally Posted By: murph75
Originally Posted By: House
Originally Posted By: murph75
Its weak in my opnion. I am still allowed to have one am I?

...........Raul Henderson.........
..............Gerrard............
...........Carroll Sauarer.......

We still need width though.


how many midfielders you having 3,4,5? either way having meireles, henderson and gerrard through the middle is far too attacking.


Isnt the object of the game to score more than the oppostion?! Why do we have to play with a defensive midfielder?!


maybe you don't always need a mascherano type player. but show me a team that doesn't have some sort of sitting midfielder? that midfield would be suicidal.

Last edited by House; 08/06/11 08:47 PM.
murph75 #129580 08/06/11 08:52 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
J
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
yeah thats true we should only play a defensive midfielder against bigger teams

murph75 #129581 08/06/11 08:53 PM
T
thundyr
Unregistered
thundyr
Unregistered
T
Sauarer? Tyrannosuarez Rex? You've had a few tonight, murph, come on admit it.

#129588 08/06/11 09:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
I love booze me!


"There's no golden ring at the end of the ride... it's all bullsh*t." Tommy Gavin
House #129593 08/06/11 09:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,590
Originally Posted By: House
Originally Posted By: murph75
Originally Posted By: House
Originally Posted By: murph75
Its weak in my opnion. I am still allowed to have one am I?

...........Raul Henderson.........
..............Gerrard............
...........Carroll Sauarer.......

We still need width though.


how many midfielders you having 3,4,5? either way having meireles, henderson and gerrard through the middle is far too attacking.


Isnt the object of the game to score more than the oppostion?! Why do we have to play with a defensive midfielder?!


maybe you don't always need a mascherano type player. but show me a team that doesn't have some sort of sitting midfielder? that midfield would be suicidal.


Suicidal in what way?

These so called holding defenders are a new thing. Great teams of the past havent had them. Whats wrong with playing teams off the park and keeping the ball?


"There's no golden ring at the end of the ride... it's all bullsh*t." Tommy Gavin
murph75 #129624 08/06/11 10:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,868
Originally Posted By: murph75


Suicidal in what way?

These so called holding defenders are a new thing. Great teams of the past havent had them. Whats wrong with playing teams off the park and keeping the ball?


no more needs to be said. here in 2011 all top teams have a sitting midfielder, it's just how it is

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion