|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 343
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 343 |
he was lucky to get away with it. a normal person wouldn't have.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,537
KopTalk Editor
|
|
KopTalk Editor
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,537 |
he was lucky to get away with it. a normal person wouldn't have.
Yup.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
he was lucky to get away with it. a normal person wouldn't have.
That is possibly true, but we weren't the jury. Our opinions on the final outcome of the trial don't count for a jot unfortunately, regardless of wheather we 'think' he was guilty or not. Whilst I may choose to sgree with the sentiments in here, we cannot start slagging him off just because we disagree with the verdict. The point anyway is that this little angelic hard done to mancunian victim is hoping to cream off as much as he can from the innocent (in law) multi millionaire, Gerrard.
Last edited by Growler; 23/08/09 10:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gedthered09
Unregistered
|
|
gedthered09
Unregistered
|
Just heard on the radio that our lovely manc friend, Mr McGoof is taking out a civil action court case against Gerrard for his dental and legal fees as he considers justice hasn't been done. He probably wants to take his kids to Disney Werld to get over all the stress and trauma this case brought upon him, bloody money grabbing get.  he is well within his rights to do so, when you have a thug and his five other mates giving you a hiding just because you wont play any of his songs. Gerrard should of been stuck away for what he done that night, the only reason he got off with it was because he has money. Oh, and there was silly me believing he was found not guilty, tsk tsk. I'm no big fan of Gerrard OFF the field, in fact I think he's a surly cocky little sod, but the jury declared NOT guilty. End of. Old McGoof is just milking it now. He does have a case against Gerrard's thuggy goons however I'd have thought. Please dont talk stupid, Gerrard has publicaly admitted that he started the fight by going over to the person twice and he also admitted hitting the person several times so tell me again about how the jury found him not guilty and how he is innocent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gedthered09
Unregistered
|
|
gedthered09
Unregistered
|
he was lucky to get away with it. a normal person wouldn't have.
That is possibly true, but we weren't the jury. Our opinions on the final outcome of the trial don't count for a jot unfortunately, regardless of wheather we 'think' he was guilty or not. Whilst I may choose to sgree with the sentiments in here, we cannot start slagging him off just because we disagree with the verdict. The point anyway is that this little angelic hard done to mancunian victim is hoping to cream off as much as he can from the innocent (in law) multi millionaire, Gerrard. hand on heart would any of us be any different if we were done in by a multi multi millionaire and we dont nothing wrong, would'nt we try to cream as much as we could off a horrible scum bag as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
[quote=Growler]Just heard on the radio that our lovely manc friend, Mr McGoof is taking out a civil action court case against Gerrard for his dental and legal fees as he considers justice hasn't been done. He probably wants to take his kids to Disney Werld to get over all the stress and trauma this case brought upon him, bloody money grabbing get. he is well within his rights to do so, when you have a thug and his five other mates giving you a hiding just because you wont play any of his songs. Gerrard should of been stuck away for what he done that night, the only reason he got off with it was because he has money. Oh, and there was silly me believing he was found not guilty, tsk tsk. I'm no big fan of Gerrard OFF the field, in fact I think he's a surly cocky little sod, but the jury declared NOT guilty. End of. Old McGoof is just milking it now. He does have a case against Gerrard's thuggy goons however I'd have thought. Please dont talk stupid, Gerrard has publicaly admitted that he started the fight by going over to the person twice and he also admitted hitting the person several times so tell me again about how the jury found him not guilty and how he is innocent. [/quote] Don't accuse me of talking stupid you plank, the JURY declared him innocent and that's a fact wheather you me or uncle Tom Cobbly like it or not. I don't give a bloody toss what that overpaid petulant idiot said in court, it's irrelevant now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gedthered09
Unregistered
|
|
gedthered09
Unregistered
|
[quote=gedthered09][quote=Growler]Just heard on the radio that our lovely manc friend, Mr McGoof is taking out a civil action court case against Gerrard for his dental and legal fees as he considers justice hasn't been done. He probably wants to take his kids to Disney Werld to get over all the stress and trauma this case brought upon him, bloody money grabbing get. he is well within his rights to do so, when you have a thug and his five other mates giving you a hiding just because you wont play any of his songs. Gerrard should of been stuck away for what he done that night, the only reason he got off with it was because he has money. Oh, and there was silly me believing he was found not guilty, tsk tsk. I'm no big fan of Gerrard OFF the field, in fact I think he's a surly cocky little sod, but the jury declared NOT guilty. End of. Old McGoof is just milking it now. He does have a case against Gerrard's thuggy goons however I'd have thought. Please dont talk stupid, Gerrard has publicaly admitted that he started the fight by going over to the person twice and he also admitted hitting the person several times so tell me again about how the jury found him not guilty and how he is innocent. [/quote] Don't accuse me of talking stupid you plank, the JURY declared him innocent and that's a fact wheather you me or uncle Tom Cobbly like it or not. I don't give a bloody toss what that overpaid petulant idiot said in court, it's irrelevant now. [/quote]the jury's verdict was influenced through money so it was not a proper verdict also i think it might of been a different outcombe had the trial been held somewhere other than Liverpool.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
the jury's verdict was influenced through money so it was not a proper verdict
IF YOU have 100% hard evidence and proof of that, I suggest you get in touch with the CPS or/and the plod without delay, or is this more mere tittle tattle?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
i think it might of been a different outcombe had the trial been held somewhere other than Liverpool. I will actually agree with you that the trial should never have been carried out in Liverpool. As for the outcome if held elsewhere, who know?. Mere speculation now.
Last edited by Growler; 24/08/09 03:40 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 933
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 933 |
You should try reading the court transcript instead of reading newpaper headlines. he was found not guilty because he believed he acted in self defence. his solicitor gave a persuasive argument stating why he acted in self defence and the jury believed him. i am no solicitor, but a fight can be started verbally as well as physically under uk law. it's pretty insulting to say the jury should have found him guilty cos he raised his fists first. also, where the case was heard is irrelevant as the jury were all asked about their football loyalties before they were sworn in.
the court says he was not guilty. anyone here who states he was guilty could be accused of slander. also, i can't think of a case were someone has been found not guilty, but forced to cough up later after a civil action finds him guilty. maybe his case is just against the ones who pleaded guilty only.
then again perhaps its easier for people to treat him as being guilty as this just shows how ignorant some people are.
|
|
|
|
|
