Prorogation unlawful, Bojo wants to try anything to win the election even if it's unlawful. The farce is getting bigger and bigger
Legal technicality but it was void not unlawful it would be unlawful if boris took exactly the same action again. The courts interpretated the law and came to a precendent decision which will impact interpretation of the law going forward. Boris did not break the law
Please offer a correction
This is what I read was said by the supreme court, I didn't make it up, I won't dare.
"This court has … concluded that the prime minister’s advice to Her Majesty [ to suspend parliament] was
unlawful, void and of no effect. This means that the order in council to which it led was also unlawful, void and of no effect should be quashed"
Can I consider the correction offered?