KopTalk


Quick Links: View All | Latest News | Liverpool FC Forum | Off Topic Forum | KopTalk Members | Help



Page 9 of 17 < 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 16 17 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#627682 - 25/09/19 02:18 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: Stanley Park]
EnergisedReds Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 20669
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Prorogation unlawful, Bojo wants to try anything to win the election even if it's unlawful. The farce is getting bigger and bigger


Legal technicality but it was void not unlawful it would be unlawful if boris took exactly the same action again. The courts interpretated the law and came to a precendent decision which will impact interpretation of the law going forward. Boris did not break the law

Please offer a correction


This is what I read was said by the supreme court, I didn't make it up, I won't dare.

"This court has Ö concluded that the prime ministerís advice to Her Majesty [ to suspend parliament] was unlawful, void and of no effect. This means that the order in council to which it led was also unlawful, void and of no effect should be quashed"

Can I consider the correction offered?


Edited by EnergisedReds (25/09/19 02:18 PM)

Top

#627683 - 25/09/19 02:21 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: EnergisedReds]
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 21/10/09
Posts: 26425
Loc: Not the EU
They declared it void which means it has no legal effect it can only be unlawful if it was repeated as the interpretation of the law was created at that point. It's also constitutional law not criminal law happy to be proved wrong
_________________________
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Top

#627684 - 25/09/19 02:25 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: Stanley Park]
EnergisedReds Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 20669
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
They declared it void which means it has no legal effect it can only be unlawful if it was repeated as the interpretation of the law was created at that point. It's also constitutional law not criminal law happy to be proved wrong


Did they say it was unlawful as well or not? If it was criminal law Boris would have had to be bailed out, not sure what your point is.

Top

#627690 - 25/09/19 04:12 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: EnergisedReds]
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 21/10/09
Posts: 26425
Loc: Not the EU
Vish it was unlawful at and from that point the judges made a new law and interpretation.

Prior to the judges decision Johnson had the advice of the attorney general (this has been sufficient for generations) it also was upheld by the English court

So Johnson is hardly the master criminal although no doubt shaggy with the IQ of a bluebottle would claim it
_________________________
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Top

#627694 - 25/09/19 05:07 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: Stanley Park]
EnergisedReds Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 20669
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Vish it was unlawful at and from that point the judges made a new law and interpretation.

Prior to the judges decision Johnson had the advice of the attorney general (this has been sufficient for generations) it also was upheld by the English court

So Johnson is hardly the master criminal although no doubt shaggy with the IQ of a bluebottle would claim it


They didn't create a new law, they just gave the interpretation of the law which also creates precedence. So the act was unlawful, whether Bojo did it in good faith or not is another matter.

Top

#627697 - 25/09/19 05:57 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: EnergisedReds]
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 21/10/09
Posts: 26425
Loc: Not the EU
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Vish it was unlawful at and from that point the judges made a new law and interpretation.

Prior to the judges decision Johnson had the advice of the attorney general (this has been sufficient for generations) it also was upheld by the English court

So Johnson is hardly the master criminal although no doubt shaggy with the IQ of a bluebottle would claim it


They didn't create a new law, they just gave the interpretation of the law which also creates precedence. So the act was unlawful, whether Bojo did it in good faith or not is another matter.


Aspects of their judgement did change the structure of the law. The legal relationship between the queen and the prime minster is now changed. Johnson consulted the attorney general every other prime minister in history would have done no more. You are right the judges did make a new precendent that's why it could not be illegal prior to that point only after and at the point of their judgement
_________________________
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Top

#627712 - 26/09/19 02:31 AM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: Stanley Park]
EnergisedReds Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 20669
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Vish it was unlawful at and from that point the judges made a new law and interpretation.

Prior to the judges decision Johnson had the advice of the attorney general (this has been sufficient for generations) it also was upheld by the English court

So Johnson is hardly the master criminal although no doubt shaggy with the IQ of a bluebottle would claim it


They didn't create a new law, they just gave the interpretation of the law which also creates precedence. So the act was unlawful, whether Bojo did it in good faith or not is another matter.


Aspects of their judgement did change the structure of the law. The legal relationship between the queen and the prime minster is now changed. Johnson consulted the attorney general every other prime minister in history would have done no more. You are right the judges did make a new precendent that's why it could not be illegal prior to that point only after and at the point of their judgement


They said in their judgement that it was unlawful isn't it? Not knowing or not understanding the law doesn't mean you can break it. I agree though that Bojo didn't know he was breaking the law, poor fellow.

Top

#627716 - 26/09/19 09:10 AM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: EnergisedReds]
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 21/10/09
Posts: 26425
Loc: Not the EU
Vish as I keep saying it was unlawful at that point and hence void. I don't fully understand the legal complexities but a constitutional lawyer did say on TV the judges had effectively changed the law in order to make judgement. What Johnson did would have been legal up to that point and it's not just this bercow has made changes to our parliamentary procedure centuries of process have been ripped up. And all this to stop us leaving the EU. My personal opinion is the judges are not impartial. I was at hillsborough and remember what the judges said about that ? Decades later it was found to be a pack of lies. Judges are human beings Vish they have their personal views just like we do.
_________________________
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Top

#627730 - 26/09/19 11:54 AM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: Stanley Park]
EnergisedReds Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 10/01/10
Posts: 20669
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Vish as I keep saying it was unlawful at that point and hence void. I don't fully understand the legal complexities but a constitutional lawyer did say on TV the judges had effectively changed the law in order to make judgement. What Johnson did would have been legal up to that point and it's not just this bercow has made changes to our parliamentary procedure centuries of process have been ripped up. And all this to stop us leaving the EU. My personal opinion is the judges are not impartial. I was at hillsborough and remember what the judges said about that ? Decades later it was found to be a pack of lies. Judges are human beings Vish they have their personal views just like we do.


Well, if you believe that so many people in respectable institutions are impartial, then you will have a major problem living in UK. To have all the 11 judges to be impartial would be quite something you know.

Top

#627745 - 26/09/19 02:49 PM Re: Who would you vote for in the next UK General Election? [Re: EnergisedReds]
Stanley Park Offline
Liverpool Legend

Registered: 21/10/09
Posts: 26425
Loc: Not the EU
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By Stanley Park
Vish as I keep saying it was unlawful at that point and hence void. I don't fully understand the legal complexities but a constitutional lawyer did say on TV the judges had effectively changed the law in order to make judgement. What Johnson did would have been legal up to that point and it's not just this bercow has made changes to our parliamentary procedure centuries of process have been ripped up. And all this to stop us leaving the EU. My personal opinion is the judges are not impartial. I was at hillsborough and remember what the judges said about that ? Decades later it was found to be a pack of lies. Judges are human beings Vish they have their personal views just like we do.


Well, if you believe that so many people in respectable institutions are impartial, then you will have a major problem living in UK. To have all the 11 judges to be impartial would be quite something you know.


What's going on in Britain right now is unbelievable 11 biased judges would surprise me not one bit. Never thought I would say that. Where it will end not sure it's getting very dangerous
_________________________
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY

Top

Page 9 of 17 < 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 16 17 >

Moderator:  KopTalk Team 
Shout Box


Advertisements

Liverpool FC Discussion
How many Man City or Leicester players would get in our team
by Snakeye
08/12/19 08:58 AM
11 points clear of city feeling safe ?
by Redro
07/12/19 09:42 PM
Club WC squad
by van Gogh
07/12/19 02:27 PM
Divok Ockoth Origi, first of his name:
by ecnirp98
07/12/19 02:15 PM
FA Cup 3:rd round draw
by redordead13
06/12/19 09:48 PM

General Discussion
BANANA DUCT-TAPED TO A WALL SELLS FOR $120,000 AT ART BASEL
by AccaBoosty
07/12/19 01:02 PM
Growlers things that make you happy thread!
by Pickles
06/12/19 01:22 PM
Music thread! (now epic)
by lumba
02/12/19 08:35 PM
pedo prince
by Markhutch1
29/11/19 10:53 AM
Extinction Rebellion
by EMP
20/11/19 08:54 PM

Top Posters (30 Days)
EnergisedReds 93
Pickles 73
ecnirp98 66
AccaBoosty 61
wilkij1975 45
van Gogh 40
Hercules/AF 58 38
Dunk 37
redordead13 27
Stanley Park 20